University Park Recreation District
3501 Quadrangle Blvd., Suite 270, Orlando, FL 32817	Phone: 407-723-5900 Fax: 407-723-5901
http://universityparkrd.com/

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of University Park Recreation District will be held on Friday, January 14, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center located 8301 The Park Boulevard, University Park, FL 34201 and or virtually.

PLEASE NOTE: Anyone seeking to physically attend the University Park Recreation District Board of Supervisors meeting MUST wear a mask and socially distance. In light of social distancing requirements, there will be limited space for members of the public to physically attend the meeting. Once the meeting space has reached capacity with social distancing parameters in place, attendance will be available ONLY through virtual means. To attend the meeting virtually, please call:

Meeting ID: 873 0997 0863
Passcode: 221330
Join meeting via Zoom:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81267651755?pwd=Q2JkTnNPaTJzQXQ4dS9hTXFocWxuZz09

NOTE: If you are calling into the meeting by phone or Zoom, please MUTE your line!

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING AGENDA

Organizational Matters
Call to Order
Roll Call to Confirm Quorum
Public Comment Period [for any members of the public desiring to speak on any proposition before the Board]
Administrative Matters
Consideration of the Minutes of the October 26, 2021 Board of Supervisors Workshop Meeting
Consideration of the Minutes of the December 3, 2021 Board of Supervisors Workshop Meeting (under separate cover)
Consideration of the Minutes of the December 10, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Staff Report Matters
District Counsel
District Manager

Club Management (under separate cover)
Management Discussion & Analysis Report
Monthly Board of Supervisors Comments
District Financial Matters
Ratification of Payment Authorization # 63

Date	Meeting Type	Time	Location	Note	
February 1, 2022	Workshop Meeting	10:00 AM	University Park
Country Club	Community Center	
February 11, 2022	BOS Meeting	1:00 PM	University Park Country Club	Community Center	

Supervisor Requests

Adjournment

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the October 26, 2021 Board of Supervisors Workshop Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORKSHOP MEETING
Tuesday, October 26, 2021
9:30 a.m.
University Park Varsity Room
7671 The Park Blvd, University Park, FL 34201

Board Members present at roll call in person or via phone:
James Case	Chairperson	
Bill DiPaolo	Vice Chairperson	
Steve Ludmerer	Treasurer	
Karen Pagano	2nd Vice Chairperson	
Sally Dickson	Assistant Secretary	

Also, Present in person or via phone:
Vivian Carvalho	District Manager - PFM Group Consulting LLC (via Zoom)
Venessa Ripoll	Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting LLC Kourtney Dinkins   Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting LLC (via phone)
Mark Barnebey	District Counsel- Blalock Walters Law Firm
(via phone)
Curtis Nickerson	Director of Properties & Facilities- Country Club John Fetsick	General Manager- Country Club
John Tice	GHA	(via Zoom)
Various Members of the General Public	(present and via Zoom)

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Organization Matters

Call to Order and Roll Call

The workshop meeting was called to order at 9:39 a.m. by Mr. Case. Ms. Ripoll confirmed quorum to proceed with the meeting. Those in attendance are outlined above.

Public Comments

Mr. Garland urged the Board to reconsider the dimensions of the croquet court. Mr. Garland stated a regulation sized court would allow a more comfortable play, so it was requested the Board add to the current dimensions of the court. Mr. Case stated consideration for the size of the court came from player surveys. Players reported concerns about having the court too close to the pond. There were also engineering concerns, as it pertains to ball protection, that would not permit a competition sized court.

Sherry Smith questioned the cutting of trees around the croquet court. Mr. Nickerson explained the dimensions of the old court as it relates to the dimensions of the new court. If the new court were to increase in size, there would be infrastructure and safety concerns.

Ms. Smith asked Mr. Nickerson to reiterate the dimensions of the court and surrounding area. Mr. Nickerson explained the size of the spaces, specifically the dimensions of the sidewalk.

Ms. Smith asked about storage of equipment. Mr. Nickerson stated they are planning an entirely different construction for storage. The equipment storage will be located along the Fitness Center retaining wall.

Peter Pizzi asked questioned the sign at the entrance not including the phrase “Country Club”. Mr. Case stated that “Country Club” is coming off the signs that are controlled by UPCAI. The Recreation District will retain two signs on University Parkway that will continue to include “Country Club” in the name of the District.

Sally Dickson confirmed name signing was discussed during the UPCAI Marketing meeting and the topic is a part of the rebranding plan. The marketing plan has not yet been presented. Mr. Case stated he is unsure if the UPRD Board has a role in the rebranding decision. Mr. Fetsick asked the Board if they refer to the neighborhood they live as “University Park Country Club”. Mr. Case stated University Park is the postal address. The Board is in agreement to be identified as “University Park Country Club”. Mr. Ludmerer explained the trademarks for the two names. Mr. Case urged Mr. Pizzi to bring his concerns about naming to the UPCAI Board.

Ms. Van Brunt made a comment about providing a safe bike route into the Country Club. Ms. Van Brunt asked the Board to examine the outdoor dining plan and extend the plan in both directions. This would allow for events in the space as membership numbers increase. Mr. DiPaolo asked Ms. Van Brunt about the feasibility of hosting the Art in the Park event in both outside and indoor spaces. Ms. Van Brunt responded the event was successful when hosted inside but would like the option to host the event outside.

There were no other public comments at this time.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion

Update on the Croquet Lawn Construction Project

Mr. Fetsick stated the update has been discussed during the public comment period. Mr. Nickerson explained the project is underway and it may seem like a slow and cumbersome process. The irrigation has been installed with drainage beginning in the next couple of days. There is still 6-8 weeks, with ideal weather, left of construction.

Ms. Van Brunt asked about those who play croquet being members of the club and questioned if there was a way to verify membership. Mr. Fetsick stated there is a fee structure and verification process for all croquet players. Mr. Ludmerer stated there should be a few events on the court to grow popularity for membership before charging for a croquet pitch.

Update of the Phase 1 Restaurant Renovation Project

Mr. Fetsick reported that the interior renovation project was making great progress. Several people are checking in with the space renovations throughout the day. Mr. Fetsick outlined items that have been completed within the project and the upcoming work that is set to begin in the next week. The project is on target for the indoor dining renovation to be complete by mid-January and the outdoor dining renovation completed after the high season.
Mr. Case noted he was happy to see two new traffic signs at the entrance to the Country Club. Mr. Fetsick acknowledged the signs are up as a temporary guide for pedestrians and traffic. There are also speed bumps that have been installed and have received mixed reviews from residents. The speed bumps are slowing traffic but are also an eye sore. The addition of a bike rack has been communicated and will be addressed at a future time.

Ms. Pagano asked if delivery of materials for the project were delayed. Mr. Fetsick stated all materials are still on schedule and there were no concerns with receiving materials.

Mr. Fetsick presented two different roof structure renderings to the Board that included a canopy structure and a more permanent roof structure. Specifications and details for both options were presented to the Board. Ms. Dickson questioned the maintenance that would be required for the options. Mr. Fetsick outlined the costs for both options and estimated the cost difference would be approximately $300,000. The canopy roof options

would require more maintenance and would need to be replaced every 8-10 years while the permanent roofing structure would last about 25-30 years before needing replacement. Mr. Tice explained the canopy maintenance details and stated the structure holding up the canopy would outlast the actual canopy.

Mr. Case asked about the insect and climate controls for each option. Mr. Fetsick asked to present all renderings before answering further questions. All renderings were presented and explained to the Board. Mr. Tice stated the canopy structure would transfer more heat than the permanent roof structure. Mr. Fetsick stated shades and insect control can be included in either design. There will be more heat and less lighting with the permanent roof structure.

Mr. Ludmerer asked about including solar panels in the permanent roof structure plans. Mr. Nickerson stated he is working with firms about adding solar panels to other areas in the Country Club and the aesthetics of adding solar panels to the dining renovation poses concerns.

Mr. Ludmerer expressed a concern about capacity of the space and adding seating. Mr. Tice stated either structure would support seat expansion however, he does not support adding seating. Adding seats to the North can become repressive and alter the character of the dining experience. Mr. Fetsick encouraged the Board to think about alternative ways to provide enhanced dining outside of the roof structure.

The Board took a 10-minute recess.

Mr. Case announced the Board will now look at financials for the roofing structure options. Mr. Fetsick presented financials for various projects to the Board. The canopy cost will be $1 million dollars while the permanent roof would cost $1.3M. In totality, depending on the outcome of the roofing structure, the total dining renovation would increase to either $2.2M or $2.5M.

Mr. Fetsick presented several other renovation and repair plans where capital funds can be allocated. It was suggested the Pro Shop be relocated to the Varsity Club. A discussion ensued about the potential shortage of capital operating funds. Mr. Fetsick stated the operational and aspirational goals of the Club will not be supported by current operations. Additional funds will be needed in the next 18-24 months.

Mr. Case asked about the benefit of spending $300k extra on the permanent roof structure as opposed to the canopy structure. Mr. Tice stated the permanent roof structure would sustain through hurricane wind forces while the canopy may get damaged through hurricane force winds. On an intangible level, the permanent look, feel, and stature of the permanent roof structure is different than the canopy. Mr. Nickerson stated the maintenance of both options are another big factor in the decision.

Mr. Pagano stated membership numbers are increasing and the Board should pay more on the onset to help grow membership numbers. The permanent roof structure is not dated, has a cleaner look, and more of what is seen in newer built Clubs. Ms. Dickson stated the canopy look is temporary and has a circus look that would not fit with what is being done on the interior. Mr. Case stated the Board should have a solid explanation of funds spent to justify the spending to residents. Mr. Ludmerer stated that dining is the amenity that is most relevant to residents and putting in an enhanced ambiance in dining space is favorable. Mr. DiPaolo asked if using the extra $300,000 for the roof structure would impact the completion of the dining project. Mr. Fetsick stated both projects can be done simultaneously. The decisions made now would not prohibit the Pro Shop resign or relocation. The permanent roof structure can have a lifespan of 3 times more than the canopy. Mr. DiPaolo suggested the Board consider Requests for Proposals to move forward with the Pro Shop relocation. Mr. Ludmerer requested additional information about the Pro Shop to set business goals for the potential revenue for the Pro Shop. There was a question about the potential space use of the Pro Shop. Mr. DiPaolo suggested the Request for Proposals would ultimately answer most of those questions. Mr. Fetsick urged the Board to be prepared to decide on the Pro Shop relocation once the dining renovations are complete to keep the momentum for the completion of projects.

Ms. Dickson asked about the timeline to reveal projects. Mr. Fetsick stated the plans should be presented at the November workshop. The capital expense details will be ready at the next workshop.

Discussion of Supervisor’s Roles

There was no discussion.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

ON MOTION by Mr. Case, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Tuesday, October 26, 2021 Workshop meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the University Park Recreation District was adjourned at 11:34 a.m.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairperson / Vice Chairperson

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the December 3, 2021 Board of Supervisors Workshop Meeting (under separate cover)

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the December 10, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
Friday, December 10, 2021
1:00 p.m.
Community Center
8301 The Park Boulevard, University Park, FL 34201

Board Members present at roll call in person or via phone: James Case	Chairperson
Bill DiPaolo	Vice Chairperson
Steve Ludmerer	Treasurer
Sally Dickson	Assistant Secretary

Also, Present in person or via phone:
Vivian Carvalho		District Manager - PFM Group Consulting LLC Venessa Ripoll	Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting LLC (via phone)
Mark Barnebey	District Counsel- Blalock Walters Law Firm
Curtis Nickerson	Director of Properties & Facilities- Country Club John Fetsick	General Manager – Country Club
Laurie Evans	Former General Manager- Country Club (via phone)
Rico Alcala	Director of New Member Experience Kevin Sassano	Food & Beverage Director
Janette Makowski	Marketing & Communication Director Various Members of the General Public

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Organizational Matters Call to Order and Roll Call
The meeting was called to order at 1:00 p.m. by Mr. Case. Ms. Carvalho confirmed quorum to proceed with the meeting. Those in attendance are outlined above.

Opening Comments

Mr. Fetsick introduced new staff to the Board. Kevin Sassano, Food and Beverage Director introduced themselves and expressed excitement to be a part of the team. Rico Alcala, Director of New Member Experience, explained they will oversee a new member orientation initiative. Mr. Alcala looks forward to the new role and expressed excitement. Janette

Makowski, Marketing and Communications Director will focus on strengthening and updating the brand. Ms. Makowski plans to modernize and streamline communications as well as facilitate high engagement on social media.

Public Comments

Mr. Case opened the public comment period.

Paul Gibson is a pickleball player and asked about the status of the pickleball court renovations. Mr. Fetsick explained a status report will be provided later in the meeting.

There were no further public comments

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Administrative Matters		
Consideration of the Minutes	
	of	the	November	2,	2021	
	Board	of	Supervisors	
	Workshop.		
The Board reviewed the Minutes and had no comments.		

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the November 2, 2021 Board of Supervisors Workshop.

Consideration of the Minutes of the November 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting.

The Board reviewed the Minutes and had no comments.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the November 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the December 3, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting.

The Board reviewed the Minutes and had no comments.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the December 3, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Report Matters

District Counsel - Update of the Charter and Statutory Amendment Changes
Mr. Barnebey announced the Charter is moving forward in the County system with the revisions that have been submitted. There is now a staff member dedicated to the matter.

Mr. Barnebey and Mr. Case attended the Legislative Delegation meeting. He stated, Senator Boyd has agreed to sponsor the bill however, the District is still looking for a House sponsor for the bill. There has been discussion with the District Chair about hiring a lobbyist to keep track of the sponsorship. Mr. Barnebey has a partner in the House, but that partner is unable to sponsor the bill because the firm works for the District. Senators are not limited to the number of bills they can sponsor but House Members are limited.

Mr. Case explained if there is no House sponsor, the District would need someone to attach the District provisions to an already sponsored bill. That would be difficult to do from a distance. If there is no sponsor for the legislation, there is an option to hire a lobbyist at an approximate cost of $5,000-$10,000. There is no restriction on hiring someone to support the interest of the District.

Mr. Barnebey stated there were no substantive changes from the last draft of the amendment.

Mr. Barnebey presented the Board with the option to make a motion to authorize the Chair to retain a legislative lobbyist with a cap on the amount it would cost to retain. Mr. Case accepted the responsibility with a cap of $10,000 to retain a legislative lobbyist if necessary, for the bill sponsorship process.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board approved Board Chair, Mr. Case, to hire a lobbyist at a maximum cost of $10,000 to retain a legislative lobbyist if necessary, for the bill sponsorship process.

Mr. Ludmerer shared a discussion that was had with Mr. Barnebey regarding taking the club private. This would mean no public play. Mr. Ludmerer stated as a Recreation District, they must allow public play. If the bond is paid off, with no debt obligations, the Recreation District could sell its assets to the Homeowners Association if they wanted to go private in the future.

Mr. Barnebey clarified that this is something that could happen many years in the future.

District Manager – Ms. Carvalho announced the next District Workshop Meeting is scheduled for January 4, 2022 at 10:00am and a Board of Supervisors Meeting on January 14, 2022 at 1:00pm. The meeting location will be in the same space, the Community Center. There is potential to change meeting locations for the February meeting.

Club Management – Mr. Fetsick provided an update to the 2022 membership plan. The November member statements have been delivered.

Staffing Update – Mr. Fetsick announced several staffing updates.

Kevin Sassano has been hired as the Food and Beverage Director. Rico Alcala has been reassigned to the new role of Director of New Member Experience. Mr. Fetsick believes each position will move the club forward in a great way.

Master Plan Update – Mr. Fetsick reported the interior dining renovations continue to trend on budget and on time. The team is confident that construction will be completed around the new year. Furniture will be delivered right after the new year. The first food and beverage event took place last week with a plan for a two-night reopening on January 14 and January 15, 2022. The team is cautiously optimistic about hosting an opening night reception on the evening of January 14, 2022.

Mr. Fetsick stated the croquet pitch has been completed. The grass is growing despite the weather being less than ideal for the past couple of weeks. The team is hopeful that the sidewalk will be installed next week. Mr. Nickerson and team have installed landscaping. The entire croquet area will look much more finished and complete with the pitch being ready for play in the upcoming weeks, weather contingent. Mr. Case praised Mr. Nickerson for the good work done on the croquet pitch.

Mr. Fetsick stated the contract to get the pickleball court completed has been signed by all vested parties. The site survey has been completed and the civil engineering design has been approved. There has been some frustration with the groundbreaking on renovations. The construction timeline is 8-10 weeks, once shovels are in the ground. March is projected to be the absolute latest for the work to be completed, with groundbreaking in early to mid-January. Mr. Case stated the completion of the site survey was the primary delay on getting the work started. Progress is still being made behind the scenes despite public facing progress being minimal. A question was raised about the green and white striped awning being the format for the club awnings going forward. Mr. Fetsick stated the decision on awning designs has not been made but they can make the decision soon. A discussion ensued about aesthetics of the awnings. Mr. Fetsick will consider awning color and pattern as the new areas continue to be completed. The design element will be cohesive with landscaping being seamless. The design is actively being worked on and Mr. Fetsick will present renderings of the pickleball design to the Board at the next meeting.	

Ms. Dickson asked about measurements for the pickle area. Mr. Fetsick stated the site survey was done with those measurements to ensure everything fits in the pickleball area. The District has contracted a landscaping company to work on the pickleball court, Fisher Engineering, who will be a part of the design aspect of the project.

Food and Beverage – There was a retirement event held to celebrate the retirement of Laurie Evans. This will be the last formal Board meeting for Ms. Evans. Mr. Fetsick commended the food and beverage team for serving over 175 households during the Thanksgiving Holiday.

Mr. Fetsick noted that golf continues to be busy with tee times. Pro Shop sales have been excellent. The first two months of the Fiscal Year have earned nearly $100,000.00 in sales. The increase in sales can be attributed to product mix, foot traffic, and new member mix. Tennis leagues have been interacting and are having lunch after league play. Fitness instructors continue to provide a wide array of fitness classes. Membership sales in October were excellent. The club is now at 361 full memberships and 121 racquet memberships.

Financials – Mr. Fetsick stated Golf continues to be over Budget. Restaurant income was
$8,500 over Budget but did fall back slightly. Mr. Fetsick will look at restaurant income year over year and will email the Board that information. Mr. Case and Mr. Fetsick noted they received exemplary comments about the Thanksgiving food and service.

Update on the potential relocation of the Pro Shop to Varsity Club – Mr. Fetsick would like to open the topic up for a workshop regarding the practicality of the repurposed Pro Shop.
Operationally, the timing and sequence, construction costs, popular happy hours, the impact on special events, and the impact on member card games are all major topics to consider as it relates to relocation planning. Mr. Fetsick stated the key to the relocation is flexibility. The Pro Shop moving to the Varsity club will enhance member experience and increase sales, along with other key benefits. The space can become the dining social hub of the club.

Mr. Fetsick explained the current Pro Shop can fit at least 16 high top tables that can fit at least 64 people. The relocated Pro Shop space can accommodate all the card game activity and 2 restrooms in the space. During the relocation, the current card room will still be available for play. The new Pro Shop space has the potential to become an actual dining experience, with a sports bar included. Immediately, the space can be a multi-use space to hold gatherings, card games, and a pop-up bar. Over time, the space can become a more expansive, sports bar like feel.

Mr. DiPaolo recapped the plans for the relocation and asked the Board to confirm the relocation plans that Mr. Fetsick has outlined. Mr. Fetsick confirmed and stated the new space would not be dormant but could immediately serve as a multi-use space. There are already funds allocated to make modest updates to the current Varsity club, repurpose the Varsity Club into a Pro Shop, and take out the center console to build 2 restrooms in the new Pro Shop. Mr.

Fetsick would like to start the Pro Shop relocation by May 1, 2022. There will be a time where both spaces would be under construction. As the Pro Shop moves, the current card room will be available for play.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board approved supporting the plan and timetable for the Pro Shop relocation.

Mr. Barnebey asked the Board if they wanted a resolution for the Pro Shop relocation to include the renderings. The Board agreed they did not need a resolution at this time since this is a concept approval of the Pro Shop relocation. The details will follow as the District gets closer into initiation the project.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Business Matters

Ratification of Resolution 2022-03, Revised Adopted Budget FY2021

Mr. Fetsick presented and reviewed the amended budget. The actual costs were outlined. There were no contingency funds used. The accounting processes are now all in house, but PFM was still completing some of the accounting work. District Counsel came in under budget.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board ratified Resolution 2022-03, Revised Adopted Budget FY2021.

Monthly Board of Supervisors Reports

Jim Case – Topic is UPCAI coordination with the Recreation District
Mr. Case stated there is new leadership within the UPCAI. The former president continues to be active and is working with Mr. Case on the signage along the University Parkway corridor. There have been discussions on how to preserve the University Park Country Club identity. It was agreed the billboard signs would be converted to state University Park Country Club. It was agreed to use the middle sign, between the entry road and exit road, that will say University Park Country Club. Ms. Dickson questioned the palm trees that are currently near the signs. Mr. Case confirmed the palm trees will be removed, the hedges removed, and the
 	plantings will be kept down so the signs can be visible. Mr. Barnebey	

confirmed he would check with the county sign code to make sure the District is adhering to sign regulations.

Sally Dickson – Topic is Future Master Planning Priorities
No update.

Bill DiPaolo – Topic is Oversight of Restaurant Renovation
Mr. Fetsick provided the necessary updates on the topic earlier in the meeting.

Steve Ludmerer – Topic is Finance, including long term financial planning options.

Karen Pagano – Topic is Communications
Mr. DiPaolo commended Ms. Pagano on the newsletter that was most recently distributed.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	District Financial Matters

Ratification	of	Payment Authorizations #60-62

Mr. Fetsick presented Payment Authorizations #60 and #62 and outlined the charges. The Board had no questions.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board ratified Payment Authorizations #60-62.

Public Comments

Mr. Case revisited the public comment period and asked if there were any public comments.

Mr. Robinson questioned the desire to take all facilities private and not allowing public participation. Mr. Case stated that was a comment not a plan or statement on what the club plans to do.

Mr. Gibson commented on the appreciation of the work on the pickleball courts. There was concern about the timeline of the pickleball court completion. Mr. Fetsick stated the goal is to complete the pickleball court by the end of the 1st quarter.

Ms. Van Brunt asked about a cover for the deck in the old Pro Shop space. Mr. Fetsick stated an awning or cover for the deck is necessary, but the concept is in the works. Ms. Van Brunt noted the opportunity to name the old Pro Shop space and suggested the Board to get input

from the community on the name.

Mr. Cantarella applauded Mr. Fetsick’s presentation on the vision of the repurposed Pro Shop space. It was suggested that consideration be given to having a foundation suitable for the second floor so the social members on the second floor can still have a view of the lake after the installation of the deck.

Mr. McDevitt commented on the utilization of the Pro Shop as it relates to bridge games and urged the Board to keep in mind the large group that needs to be accommodated. The current group needs about 13 tables to run the game. Mr. Fetsick stated the new space will accommodate at least 16 tables and 80 people. There will be plenty of room to host the card games.

Mr. Mantia emphasized the need to have a workshop about the old Pro Shop plans. There was a suggestion on the name of the space.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Mr. Case requested a motion to adjourn the Board of Supervisors’ Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Friday, December 10, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting of University Park Recreation District was adjourned at 2:27 p.m.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairperson / Vice Chairperson

University Park Recreation District

District Counsel

University Park Recreation District

District Manager

University Park Recreation District

Club Management
(under separate cover)

University Park Recreation District

Monthly Board of Supervisors Reports

University Park Recreation District

Ratification of Payment Authorization # 63

12/9/2021

University Park Recreation District

Payment Authorization No. 63

O&M - General Fund Expenses

Vendor	Invoice	Description	Amount	
Blalock Walters	40896-000-37	General Representation - November 2021	$	3,821.50	
McClatchy Company, LLC	80349	Notice of Public Meeting -November 2021	$	340.47	
Vglobal Tech	3383	ADA Website Maintenance	$	208.33	
US Bank	6338044	Bond Administration Fee	$	7,573.91	
PFM	DM-12-2021-50	District Management Fee: December 2021	$	5,833.33	
PFM	OE-EXP-11-40	Postage	$	0.53	
PFM	117472	Billable Expenses	$	163.24	
PFM	117033	Billable Expenses	$	471.50	

O&M - General Fund Expenses Total	$	18,412.81

Asst. Secretary/Seetary

University Park Recreation District

Supervisor Requests