University Park Recreation District
12051 Corporate Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32817	Phone: 407-723-5900
http://universityparkrd.com/

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of University Park Recreation District will be held on Friday, June 11, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. at the Varsity Club located 7671 The Park Blvd, University Park, FL 34201 and or virtually.

PLEASE NOTE: Anyone seeking to physically attend the University Park Recreation District Board of Supervisors meeting MUST wear a mask and socially distance. In light of social distancing requirements, there will be limited space for members of the public to physically attend the meeting. Once the meeting space has reached capacity with social distancing parameters in place, attendance will be available ONLY through virtual means. To attend the meeting virtually, please call:

Meeting ID: 820 1951 4619
Passcode: 953401
Join meeting via Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82019514619?pwd=SytKLzJyL21jZGJhWkJ0cHlsQnlDZz09

NOTE: If you are calling into the meeting by phone or Zoom, please MUTE your line!

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING AGENDA

Organizational Matters
Call to Order
Roll Call to Confirm Quorum
Public Comment Period [for any members of the public desiring to speak on any proposition before the Board]
Administrative Matters
Consideration of the Minutes of the April 9, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Consideration of the Minutes of the April 9, 2021 Continuation of the Board of Supervisors Meeting
Consideration of the Minutes of the May 14, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Business Matters
Pickleball Advisory Volunteer Group Presentation
Update on the Website Development with the UPCAI
Review & Consideration of Phase 1 RFP Master Improvement Plan Project Proposals
Review & Discussion of Charter Amendments
Consideration of Amendment to the Water Agreement with UPCAI
Monthly Board of Supervisors Reports

Jim Case- Topic is UPCAI coordination with the Recreation District.
Sally Dickson- Topic is Marketing
Bill DiPaolo- Topics are Finance and Charter Amendments relating to the Election and other items within the Charter to be amended.
Steve Ludmerer- Topic is District Management Structure
Karen Pagano- Topic is Communications
Review & Acceptance of FY 2020 Audit Report
Other Business
Staff Reports
District Counsel
District Manager
General Manager & Director of Finance
Management Discussion & Analysis Report
Confirmation of additional workshops
District Financials
Ratification of Payment Authorizations # 49-50

Date	Meeting Type	Time	Location	Note	
June 29, 2021	BOS Workshop Meeting	10:00 AM	University Park Country Club	The Varsity Club	
July 9, 2021	BOS Meeting	1:00 PM	University Park Country
Club	The Varsity Club	

Supervisor Requests

Adjournment

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 9, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
Friday, April 9, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. University Park Country Club
7671 The Park Blvd, University Park, FL 32401

Board Members present at roll call:
James Case	Chairperson
Steve Ludmerer	Vice Chairperson
Sally Dickson	Assistant Secretary
Karen Pagano	2nd Vice Chairperson
Bill DiPaolo	Treasurer

Also, Present:
Vivian Carvalho		District Manager - PFM Group Consulting LLC Venessa Ripoll	Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting LLC (via phone)
Mark Barnebey	District Counsel- Blalock Walters Law Firm Laurie Evans	General Manager- Country Club
Curtis Nickerson	Director of Properties & Facilities- Country Club John Fetsick	Director of Finance- Country Club
Rico Alcala	Director of Operations- Country Club John Scott	Fawley Bryant
Aaron Jacobson	Fawley Bryant
Emmett Gregory	Kimley Horn & Associates
Chris Ciantaglione	Kimley Horn & Associates Various Members of the General Public

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Call to Order and Roll Call

The meeting was called to order at 1:02 p.m. by Mr. Case.	Ms. Carvalho notated that quorum was confirmed to proceed with the Board of Supervisors Meeting.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Organizational Matters Opening Comments
Mr. Case provided opening remarks for the Board of Supervisors meeting.

Public Comments

Mr. Carlin had specific comments regarding croquet. The University Park County Club is the only Country Club in the area with croquet and he wishes to retain croquet in the University Park County Club.

Ms. Bertsch raised concerns about the finance of the community and the costs associated with the proposed improvements to the University Park County Club. She was informed some homeowners are considering moving due to concerns about the future cost of living in the University Park Recreation District.

Ms. VanBrunt invited everyone to attend “Art in the Park” when the meeting has concluded.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Administrative Matters

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 2, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 2, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Board approved the March 2, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting Minutes.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 9, 2021 Continued Board of Supervisors’ Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 9, 2021 Continued Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board approved the March 9, 2021 Continued Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting Minutes.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 9, 2021 Finance

Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The minutes of the March 9, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting will be addressed at the May Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Pagano, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the March 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 16, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 16, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the March 16, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 23, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 23, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the March 23, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 24, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 24, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the March 24, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 30, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The minutes of the March 30, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting will be addressed at the May meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 1, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 1, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the April 1, 2021 Special Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Business Matters

Public Hearing on Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining Membership Categories and Amounts
Presentation of Dues and Fees
Public Comments and Testimony
Board Comments

Mr. Case provided some thoughts about the proposed fees and recommended continuing this public hearing to April 20, 2021. Mr. Case requested a motion to open the Public Hearing.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with all in favor, the Board opened the Public Hearing.

Mr. DiPaolo raised the comments on membership dues.

The dues and the bonds each accomplish a different objective. The UPRD uses the bond funds for major innovative capital projects. The dues are used to operate the Club, offset the cost of amenities and to build the capital reserves for routine replacements, maintenance projects as the District move forward. The District needs $1,000,000.00 each year to maintain the University Park County Club. The UPCC must build its own capital reserves through the dues structure.

Mr. Ludmerer provided some history with the University Park County Club. The primary focus as a Board should be to put a master plan in place, communicate its benefits, and secure the commitment of the residents and members to finance its implementation. He echoed Mr. DiPaolo’ s comment. The UPRD needs about $1,000,000.00 per year to sustain its long-term health. There are three levels of capital to meet the District’s needs. They include (1) the capital from the original bond proceeds to support Phase 1 of the Master Plan, (2) a bond or assessment which will be needed for the major renovations being considered in Phase 2, and a capital contribution from dues to replace routine aging equipment (kitchen appliances, roofs, HVAC, etc.). The Proposed Membership Plan was intended to accomplish approximately $600,000.00 - $700,000.00 of the $1,000,000.00 per year with the other one-third from unidentified sources. Mr. Ludmerer suggested all residents contribute. Another approach might be to keep the annual dues at the current level and add a capital due bill every year. Instead, the Finance Committee looked at the allocation mechanism of 7% of dues to be sequestered for capital reserve and 10% of

outside play, food and beverage, and 100% of initiation fees to be sequestered to get toward the $1,000,000.00 total , which got to $600,000.00. Mr. Ludmerer also provided some history of the Club since the bonds were issued and provided some data.

Ms. Evans provided some feedback from everyone. She provided the history of the Membership Planning Group. The Membership Plan was created using surveys and focus groups. She provided a summary of the previous Membership Plan and included the feedback the Planning Group had to consider. She also outlined the proposed membership categories.

Mr. Case opened the floor for general public comments regarding this agenda item.

Mr. Rezano, a homeowner, stated not eliminating the food and beverage minimum is a smart plan. He suggested University Park County Club should create a separate capital fund and put a line item on every monthly due and make it restrictive. Capital money that member pays does not have a sales tax, but sales tax is paid on operations. The Membership Planning group will look into that.

Mr. Brandy echoed Mr. Rezano. The University Park County Club should separate capital into a reserve fund. Mr. Brandy asked if the $1,000,0000 in question is for operations, capital, or both. Mr. Fetsick responded the County Club generates an operation surplus annually in the amount of $300,000.00 - $400,000.00 per year. He thinks the University Park County Club needs to separate obligated capital, improvements and enhancements to the County Club. There is obligatory capital that the UPCC is looking at to raise
$1,000,000.00 each year of surplus to ensure it has the capital needed for roof replacement, kitchen equipment, HVAC equipment, etc. Separate from the $1,000,000.00, the UPCC needs to generate funds for improvements such as building a new varsity club, renovating the grill, etc. Once the bond money is entirely spent, the District needs to address capital needs for the future for nonrecurring non-annual capital

A homeowner asked if the UPCC has not had a reserve fund until this point and is only now trying to fund one. Mr. Ludmerer confirmed that was an accurate statement.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 11, Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining Membership Categories and Amounts

Mr. Case requested a motion to continue the public hearing on Adopting the Revised Rules of Procedure to April 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. at the Varsity Club.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board continued the Public Hearing on Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining Membership Categories and Amounts to April 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. at the Varsity Club.

Review and Consideration of Resolution 2021-12, regarding Terminating of Additional Operation Recovery Surcharge

Mr. Barnebey recommended the Resolution to be deferred until that correction is made and consider at the Continued Meeting.

At 2:05 p.m., the meeting recessed. It was reconvened at 2:18 p.m.

Presentation of 90 Days Master Plan from Fawley Bryant

Mr. Case provided an overview of the Strategic Planning Group and Master Plan Presentation.

John Scott and Emmett Gregory reviewed the final presentation of the 90 Days Master Plan. Phase 1 of the master plan was understanding the history and culture of the Country Club in the first 30 days. Phase 2 was the second 30 days which details how the master plan would work. It took the vision of Fawley Bryant and the vision of the Board, Planning Group, and residents. Phase 3 is implementing the designs, and the University Park County Club is moving into the adoption of the Phase 1 projects. The Phase 1 projects include the following;

Modernization of the Grille & Banquet Room
An outdoor bar
Firepit area
Varsity Club
Administration
Card Room Modernization
Walking Trail Implementations on Parcel L
Low Impact ideas for Parcel L
Pickleball Complex Implementations
Option A. Existing Croquet Parcel
Option B. Parcel L

Multiuse Outdoor Space
Option-Regulation size croquet pitch
Yoga
Existing Parking expansions
Eastside of property outside hole 10
Estimate of Probable cost

Mr. Scott stated the long-term vision splits into two options depending on where pickleball is ultimately located:

Option A
Pickleball is located at existing croquet fields
Relocation of croquet
Grille and Banquet addition
Indoor/outdoor bar implementation
Option B
Location of Pickleball on Parcel L
Grille and Banquet addition
Indoor/outdoor bar implementation
Croquet remains in present location

The addition of future phases could look like the following:
New Cart Barn
New Cart staging
Repurpose Varsity Club into a Pro Shop
Restroom renovation to existing locker rooms on golf
Repurpose of the existing Pro Shop
Gathering space or
Grab & Go
Tennis Pro Shop Renovation/Expansion
Classrooms
Studio space for fitness
Tennis shade structure in existing garden space.
New Varsity Club Building
Car Parking area
Water Features- Fountains

John Scott commented the UPCC is a very beautiful club. It has matured established landscaping, vibrant culture and history, community feel, incredible views of golf and nature, award-winning golf experience, great response to the Covid-19 pandemic. It also had the availability for space and growth with parcel L and increasing village like quality. He received feedback that some of the  interior spaces are dated, heavy  furniture,

unfavorable layouts in existing buildings, car parking and circulation concerns, pedestrian safety, the bag drop & pro shop disconnect between golf.

Fawley Bryant compared existing Country Clubs within a 10-mile radius to find opportunities to get ahead of some of those Clubs. He summarized the landscaping in the District and the core values of the club.

John Scott reviewed improvements that need to make their way into The Master Plan that consist of the following immediate needs:
The Varsity Club
Cart Storage
Fitness
Pro Shop
Connect to Golf Operations
Locker and Storage Room Buildings
Cart Parking Expansion
Reimagine Entry Sequence
Sense of Arrival
Improving Pedestrian Connections
Integration of Brand & History
Great Membership Experience
Improve Village Quality and Connection
Widen Cart Paths
Walking Trails
Casual Dining/Outdoor Space
Activity and Meeting Space
Pickleball/Croquet Considerations
Parking Lot Improvements and Expansions
Improved Wayfinding
Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic Pattern

John Scott discussed the village concepts. They are small intimate, and unique spaces designed for social interaction, locally driven, locally responsive, functional, and a mixed community. Fawley Bryant tried to put those into the Master Plan.

Emmett Gregory presented a wayfinding diagram. He discussed re-orientating the entry to a north-south orientation to make the entrance more prominent. He looked at vehicular circulation from entry point to final destination and golf wayfinding to make it as clear and concise as possible.

John Scott went through the diagrams with the various current features and expansions, including Option A & B for pickleball.

John Scott presented the future overall master plan, which includes the implementation of all phases of work.
Entry Boulevard
Grille & Banquet Renovation
Outdoor Dining
Indoor/Outdoor Bar
Fire Pits
Gathering Space
Cart Barn
Bag Drop
Restroom/ Locker Room
Cart Stagging
Varsity Club
Playground
Walking Trails
18. Multi-flex Lawn
Pickleball Complex
Option A
Option B
Tennis Pro-Shop / Fitness
Water Features
Gazebo

John Scott presented photos and renderings to depict the tone, design, and color palette for each project of the master plan outlined above.

A discussion took place regarding the estimate of probable cost. Fawley Bryant has continued to provide a range of costs and sent those costs over to a general contractor, Atlas Building Company, who put together an idea of cost. The numbers are for initial phase scope projects only. The list includes numbers for parking spaces, croquet, outdoor fitness, pickleball, outdoor dining, widening of cart paths, implementation of wayfinding signs, fire pits, walking trails, Varsity Club renovation, Banquet Grille renovation and the addition to that space. Emmett Gregory stated the numbers are in line, but what stood out was the pickleball court number was lower than Fawley Bryant, but it does not take clearing cost, lights, etc., into consideration. It is an excellent analysis to know that Fawley Bryant is on target with the cost as well.

John Scott discussed the long-term vision plans. He discussed the Grille & Banquet addition and the indoor/outdoor bar addition. Mr. Scott discussed the eventual relocation of the croquet courts. John Scott discussed the golf operations with the new cart barn, cart staging, and a repurposed Varsity Club Pro Shop and administration. There is room for 150 carts, mechanical offices, bag storage, restrooms, laundry, a breakroom, workshop, and hazmat storage. He discussed the proposed Varsity Club for the Pro Shop

and identified 2,970 square feet to use a Golf Pro Shop and golf offices. Relocating the Pro Shop to the existing Varsity Club will allow using the existing Pro Shop square footage for expanded gathering space and meetings and or utilize it for a grab and go. The Varsity Club will need to be established in a new Varsity Club building. He discussed the Tennis Pro Shop renovation and fitness classes. He presented a floor plan for the new Varsity Club and presented a floorplan of the final master plan. A QR code was provided, which links to a website with a video of the University Park County Club master plan renovations at https://www.fawleybryant.com/upcc. The video can be updated as the project proceeds. John Scott presented renderings of the outdoor dining space, the outdoor bar, fire pit area, the multi-use outdoor area, the indoor/outdoor bar, the new Varsity Club, The Tennis Pro Shop, and Golf bag drop.

The meeting recessed at 3:16 p.m. and reconvened at 3:26 p.m.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 10, Approval of Final Master Plan from Fawley Bryant

Mr. Case stated he liked Fawley Bryant’s concepts. Some priorities were not addressed in the presentation, mainly the problems with the existing parking lot. John Scott stated those will be addressed in the near future and will be incorporated into the Master Plan. As part of the Phase 1 parking expansion, they will ensure a detailed sight-specific look at the critical needs and address those at that time.

A discussion took place about the inadequacy of the fitness center. Enhancing the current amenities is also a top priority as the master plan proceeds. Mr. Case raised concerns about the outside dining. He is reluctant to disturb Parcel L. He is not enthusiastic about building a pickleball court. The area adjacent to the current croquet pitch would be a good location for pickleball.

Ms. Dickson asked if the walking trails would weave around the existing trees to remove the mature landscaping. John Scott responded the intention is to create the trail on-site, walk Parcel L and understand where the trees worth saving are located and identify a route that would disturb minimum vegetation. Ms. Dickson had questions regarding the mixed-use space and John Scott noted the Board decides to assign that as the croquet pitch or mixed-use lawn and Fawley Bryant has identified an option to provide a separate croquet pitch which is north of the existing fitness center. If pickleball is located at Parcel L, there are opportunities to expand the existing croquet pitch to an entire side pitch on the site it stands currently. Ms. Dickson stated the entryway rendered does not change the existing drive. John Scott confirmed that is correct. Ms. Dickson stated the rendering is a lot of concrete which is a little in opposition to the Country Club wanting to keep the lush greenery. She asked if there is another way to accomplish the master plan without so much concrete. John Scott replied there is an opportunity to provide parking areas that

should alleviate some congestion. There is also an opportunity to freshen the landscape. Ms. Dickson noted the UPCC mission, vision, and core values talk about maintaining the natural landscape. Ms. Dickson is not in favor of putting pickleball courts on Parcel L. She wants Parcel L to be kept as natural.

Mr. Ludmerer discussed fitness options. He discussed widening cart paths as an unnecessary item and thinks the Country Club will have the same issues an issue with cars parking on the cart paths, unless specific cart parking areas are provided. . He believes Parcel L provides the best location for pickleball from an aesthetic and acoustic perspective. He provided an excerpt form a letter statement from UPCAI to UPRD dated March 28, 2021.

Mr. DiPaolo echoed the comments regarding the priority for fitness. The fitness area doesn’t work in the tennis area because it is too small. He suggested the proposed location of a new Varsity Club could be a good location for a fitness center. That would allow the tennis center to have a location for a pro shop to service tennis, pickleball, and fitness. He suggested taking a close look at the cart paths. He is skeptical the cost of a pickleball court would be only $50,000.00 more on Parcel L due to irrigation, electricity, restoration of landscaping.

Ms. Pagano stated the recommendation for putting the fitness center in the proposed Varsity Club spot is a great idea and asked where the Varsity Club would be placed. Mr. DiPaolo thinks that once the UPCC expands outdoor dining, it will be twice the size and unified with the promenade and take the current pro shop and serve the Varsity Club purpose. A lengthy discussion took place. Ms. Pagano asked John Scott if the cost estimate for the Varsity Club renovation is based on a refresh which was discussed. John Scott confirmed. Ms. Pagano is in favor of Parcel L as the location for pickleball. The UPCC can maintain a lot of the landscaping around the pickleball courts on Parcel L.

Mr. Case stated the District has to consider noise disturbance that pickleball may create wherever it is placed. A discussion took place about controlling acoustics.

Mr. Barnebey explained the Development of Reginal Impact has certain limitations The Country Club building has a size limit. The first phase of improvements will not cause any issues. Any significant improvements may require County approvals, and a new Varsity Club will trigger a Notice of Proposed Change to the existing DRI and Development Orders. Mr. Whyte discussed the DRI issues. By the time the UPCC gets around to expand, the DRI will likely have expired and not apply to the long-term master plan. Mr. Barnebey stated the DRI numbers match the current site plan, so the UPRD will probably have to amend something if they move forward with a significant development. When any major building expansion happens, the UPRD will have to modify the approvals, including the DRI, development orders or both, to increase the allowable square footage. John Scott stated everything presented for Phase 1 is viable under the current entitlements.

Mr. Fetsick stated #17 is an open space suggested as the multi-purpose land. The new Varsity Club is being shown to its right, which is also in Parcel L. If the Varsity Club building does not get developed, that is currently Parcel L. If the UPCC opens up #17 there is still going to be a cluster of woods to its right unless the entire space is open. He asked the Board to keep that in mind. The master plan has pickleball in two locations and gives both options.

Ms. Evans provided some feedback on the renovation. People need to be open to the fact that the way they have experienced Wednesday, or Friday night will be different and better in the end. Having the dining space in one area where people can move between spaces is ideal. For years she was asked to move happy hour outside to the café. Now the community will have it, love it, and they will not want to revert to previous aesthetics.

Mr. Case opened the floor for public comments

Mr. Duval provided some feedback regarding pickleball courts and the noise disturbance it will create. Tennis players will not want to play next to pickleball due to the noise. He commented on the visual of entry into the Country Club. He is in favor of placing pickleball in Parcel L.

Ms. Mary Jane Sanocore stated she moved into the community because of the trees and shade. She thinks Parcel L. is a treasure to the community and should not be developed Mr. Klein stated the architect’s vision is excellent. He put together an idea to put pickleball where the croquet is located and start the whole plan by not developing Parcel L. This will save money in water, electricity, clear-cutting, fill and restoration of landscaping. He discussed the walking trail.

Mr. Gibson stated there is a level of noise from pickleball, primarily from players and not the ball itself. He asked about the timeframe to develop parcel L. John Scott stated the difference between developing pickleball on Parcel L vs. on the croquet court is a 1-2 months difference. The overall process is 18-24 months for design, permitting, construction of pickleball no matter its location. Mr. Gibson suggested converting a tennis court to two pickleball courts.

Ms. Barbra Somma. thanked the Board and Fawley Bryant. She commented on the feedback regarding Ms. Evans's comments regarding expansion to dining areas and noted there were only minor changes to the kitchen area. She asked what is in the plan for the kitchen. Ms. Evans said there are no plans for the expansion of the kitchen. There may be a need to reconfigure the kitchen at some point. She does not know if a significant expansion of the kitchen is required but expanding the hours will help and offering service in different locations during the same hours of the day. The bigger challenge is finding

staff to service those extended hours. The kitchen will need new equipment in the current space at some point.

Mr. Kramer supports the concept of putting pickleball in Parcel L for noise reduction. It will be a major problem if it is anywhere near the outdoor activities. He asked if Fawley Bryant had the tennis pros input on their opinion. The covered roof concept for outdoor dining seems nice but has a potential for leakage and maintenance problems over time. He asked about HOA reserve and how that fits into this discussion. Mr. Case stated that the HOA reserves money for various future needs of the residential community for repaving roads. Any existing reserves for the HOA does not impact the UPRD budget and the discussion pertaining to the Master Plan. Mr. Ludmerer spoke to the tennis pros who were initially concerned about not having regular maintenance and observing violations of non- pickleball players using the courts. It is the same issue they have with tennis. Someone in the office can enforce the rules when a member points out the problem. Maintenance can be scheduled. The tennis pros left him with the impression they were neutral between the two proposed locations for pickleball. Mr. Nickerson brought up maintenance concerns.

John Scott addressed the concern regarding the covered roof concept. Fawley Bryant will give the Board options when that project goes into a complete design stage.

Mr. Gio Canterella complimented the Board and Fawley Bryant on their vision of the future. He thinks the UPCC should get more public comment on the location of pickleball. He commented on the noise disturbance. He thinks the Fawley Bryant recommendation of Parcel L is the most valid for the future.

Mr. Whyte congratulated Fawley Bryant on the Master Plan and the Board on their initiative to get the UPCC this far. He commented on the discussions of the Planning Group. They discussed fitness centers, wellness centers, and massage parlors. Building on Parcel L would have accomplished that. He encouraged the Board to keep as many flexible options as possible.

Ms. Joyce Giberti commented on the golf carts coming in the main entrance. She suggested having the golf carts trail be split separately, so they do not come through the main entrance.
Consideration of Resolution 2021- 10, Approval of Final Master Plan from Fawley Bryant

Mr. Case presented Resolution 2021-10. The Board reviewed Exhibit B, which is the same, and it orders the priorities of the Master Plan.

Mr. Barnebey wanted the Board to ensure it had the Final Master Plan from Fawley Bryant dated April 2021 was attached to the Resolution.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Ms. Dickson, lengthy discussion ensued in regards to the Exhibit A for the two alternatives for pickleball within the Resolution 2021- 10 the motion did not get carried.

Exhibit A maintains the two alternatives for pickleball. Mr. Case suggested the District vote on option A or exclude option B for the location of pickleball. A discussion took place. Mr. Ludmerer asked if the District can get opinions to suggest what the sound implications could be on an adequately insolated prepared shielded pickleball court. Fawley Bryant said they could reach out to Welch Tennis and those in the area who has pickleball courts to better understand its implications from a sound perspective. Mr. Ludmerer asked for a representative to look at both sites and recommend a location for pickleball. Fawley Bryant has racquet court experts they will recommend. John Scott noted his company is working in over 80 pickleball courts in Southwest Florida, and they are being built separate from tennis facilities for the reasons many people expressed today. Fawley Bryant recommends Parcel L for the location of pickleball. They also noted they will have to make drainage improvements around the ditch at the current croquet site to put pickleball there. They will not have to do additional screening with landscape vegetation in Parcel L. The cost implications are competitive. Parcel L can be visually and acoustically screened. John Scott commented locating pickleball in Parcel L will be a much greater asset than having it at the entry.

Ms. Dickson does not feel as though we understand all of the financial implications at this point. However, it is not a financial question. It is about preserving the natural landscape of Parcel L.
Mr. Case stated it is the consensus of the Board Pickleball not be Developed in Parcel L.

Mr. Ludmerer stated he believes the District has an opportunity to understand the impact of both locations better to learn from with greater expertise the implications of the sound in each location and how it could be mitigated. It would do a disservice to the community not to get that information.

ON MOTION by Mr. Case, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with 3 in favor (Mr. Case, Mr. DiPaolo, Ms. Dickson) and 2 opposed (Ms. Pagano and Mr. Ludmerer), the Board amended the Master Plan Concept from Fawley Bryant to exclude Option B for pickleball location on Parcel L.

The Board was asked to approve Resolution 2021-10 as amended.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Ms. Dickson, with 3 in favor (Mr. Case, Mr. DiPaolo, Ms. Dickson) and 2 opposed (Ms. Pagano and Mr. Ludmerer), the Board approved Resolution 2021-10, Approval of the amended Fawley Bryant Master Plan Concept dated April 2021 (removing Option B for pickleball location on Parcel L) as the Final Master Plan.

A discussion took place asking if, instead of going through a formal RFQ process, the District piggyback on Manatee County’s ongoing services process and public advertisement. Mr. Barnebey stated the District could piggyback onto a project in lieu of going through an RFP process. Ms. Evans and Mr. Nickerson stated the thought is to piggyback off of an architectural services on-call or engineering services on call that the County typically has and a list of vendors and have the opportunity to pick from that approved vendor list. Mr. Barnebey thinks that it is possible.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Continuation

Mr. Case requested a motion to continue the meeting from the Board of Supervisors from April 9, 2021 to April 20, 2021 at 10:00AM at the Varsity Club.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Pagano, with all in favor, the Friday, April 9, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting for University Park Recreation District was continued at 5:02 p.m. to Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. at the Varsity Club.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairperson / Vice Chairperson

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 9, 2021 Continuation of the Board of Supervisors Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT CONTINUED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. University Park Varsity Club
7671 The Park Blvd, University Park, FL 32401

Board Members present at roll call:
James Case	Chairperson
Steve Ludmerer	Vice Chairperson
Sally Dickson	Assistant Secretary
Karen Pagano	2nd Vice Chairperson
Bill DiPaolo	Treasurer

Also, Present:
Vivian Carvalho	District Manager - PFM Group Consulting LLC
Venessa Ripoll	Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting LLC (via phone)
Mark Barnebey	District Counsel- Blalock Walters Law Firm Laurie Evans	General Manager- Country Club
Curtis Nickerson	Director of Properties & Facilities- Country Club John Fetsick	Director of Finance- Country Club
Rico Alcala	Director of Operations- Country Club Various Members of the General Public

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Call to Order and Roll Call

The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Mr. Case.	Ms. Carvalho notated that quorum was confirmed to proceed with the Board of Supervisors Continued Meeting.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Business Matters Public Comments
Mr. Case provided opening remarks and provided an overview of the items accomplished at the last meeting.

Public comments will be taken during the public hearing and at the end of the meeting.

Public Hearing on Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining	Membership Categories and Amounts
Presentation	of	the Membership Categories and Amounts
Public Comments and Testimony
Board Comments

Ms. Case requested a motion to reconvene the Public Hearing.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Board reconvened the Public Hearing.

Ms. Evans provided introductory comments and thanked everyone for the comments and feedback. The Membership Plan was revised. The UPCC is trying to drive operational surplus to begin to build required maintenance and capital replacement reserves. She explained the items that would be covered under such a reserve. Feedback showed the UPCC needed to address the following concerns;
Single Membership
Retain Food & Beverage
Added Pickleball Access Pass
Revised Pricing Structure

Mr. Fetsick provided some comments regarding the funding needs and the reasons for the operational surplus.

He discussed the bond which included a construction fund totaled $4,200,000.00.
$1,500,000.00 has been spent on infrastructure renovations of the golf course holes #1-9 and this summer holes #10-18 will be renovated. It also funded HVAC and roof replacements, ad-hoc kitchen equipment. This is not for ongoing day to day maintenance of the Club. The Construction funds were to be used for capital infrastructure needs of Club only. He stated the $2,700,000.00 is remaining in the Construction Fund of the Bond and this is how the UPCC will pay for Phase 1 Improvements of the Master Plan.

M. Fetsick next discussed the PPP Loan PBM was able to receive in 2020. The forgiveness application has been filed. If the PPP Loan is forgiven, PBM may forgive any

monies advanced to UPCC. If that happens, the Country Club may have an opportunity to use any operating surplus and earmark it to support the Phase 1 Improvement Project.

When the bond construction fund proceeds are spent the UPCC will use the revenue from capital reserves that may be generated from the new membership plan. To do so, the Country Club must generate operational surplus for annual ongoing capital replacement reserves. Additional phases of the Master Plan then need to be considered and financing options for them need to be, in addition to normal capital reserves.

Capital Reserve replacements and ongoing repairs should be covered out of operational capital reserves. Current operations support today but do not build reserves for the future. It does not support ongoing future needs of the Club. Emergency reserve funds need to be considered for unexpected losses. A bond may be necessary but it not an answer for capital replacement reserves. It is not financially responsible to fund annual ongoing reserve needs with long term debt. There was a promise made 36 months ago that the UPCC would not expect to do an immediate bond or assessment. The new Membership Dues Structure will satisfy operational needs, short term capital reserve needs of the Club. He explained the bond process.

Mr. Fetsick mentioned a bond may need to be considered for future large Capital Improvements, for example Phase 2 of the Master Plan. He discussed the Membership Plan Presentation.

Mr. Fetsick reminded the Board and public about the Mission, Vision, and Core Values of the Club. The Membership structure has not changed he recommended 6 Membership Categories be reduced to 3. Eliminating the following categories;
Jr. Executive Membership
Sport Membership
Twilight Tennis Membership

Mr. Fetsick recommended the following categories
Full Membership
$500.00 Social Access Pass required for Spouses/Partners
Racquet Membership
$500.00 Social Access Pass required for Spouses/Partners
Social Resident Membership
Family Membership- anyone with a Spouse/Partner in the same home
Single- only for single individuals

Mr. Fetsick presented the following updated Prices:
Full Membership
a) Family- $9,250.00
b) Single- $7,000.00

Racquet Membership
a) Family- $4,000.00
b) Single- $3,000.00
Social Resident Membership
a) Family- $1,000.00
b) Single - $750.00

Mr. Fetsick discussed the flexibility of the Membership Plan with three membership categories the UPCC is providing especially for social members. A number of passes can be added on an a la cart basis to the Membership as follows:
Fitness Center Pass
Twilight Racquets Pass
Pickleball Pass
Players Golf Card Pass
Annual Range Pass
Each Amenity was added as an a la cart option. He discussed flexible options for the Social Membership.

Mr. Fetsick stated when creating a due structure it is important to understand competition. The competitive considerations have evolved. The Planning Committee previously used private Clubs that were priced well above UPCC. Feedback was taken into consideration and the competitive considerations was changed. The District dues structure is now between Meadows and Palm Aire and Waterleaf and Rosedale. He is confident University Park County Club provides a superior product to Waterleaf and Rosedale and where it sits with recommended pricing is exactly where they should be.

Mr. Fetsick discussed initiation fees. The UPCC needs to build reserves for the future and reestablish and rebrand the County Club within the Market. These fees impact new members. No current members are impacted with these new dues.

He recommended an increase to the following initiation fees:
1. Full Membership $7,500.00
2. Racquet $2,000.00 3. Social $1,000.00

Mr. Fetsick discussed trail fees have not changed for several years and remained flat even through cart fees have increased. It is recommended to increase proportionately between resident and non-resident members.

Mr. Fetsick stated the feedback for the Food & Beverage minimum was overwhelming. The UPCC will retain the Food & Beverage minimum. All members will receive a 20% discount on a la cart dining. Over time menu proves will increase 20% which will ensure

members today will spend the same amount but increase the revenue through non- member spending.

Mr. Fetsick discussed the estimated financial impact. He outlined the Calendar 2020 results, the worst case, most likely case, and best-case scenario for this new Membership dues structure.

In a worst-case scenario 10 full members resign, 10 racquets members resign, and 50 social. In a most likely case 5 full members resign, 5 racquet members resign, and 25 social members resign. In a best-case scenario no additional attrition is assumed. Ms. Evans provided comments on attrition. Even in a worst case scenario the Club can run the Operations of the Club and support the funding of the RD Budget costs which are the costs associated with the Recreation District Budget and generate Capital of $220,000.00. This is all attributed to initiation fees.

In a most likely case scenario, the Club can be net neutral and generate Capital of
$495,000.00. It is attributed to initiation fees plus outside golf fees. The Club can allocate 10% of outside golf to generate an additional $200,000.00 of Capital. The Club would have an operational net neutral, function operations, and generate almost $500,000.00 of Capital.

In a best case scenario, the Club can generate operational surplus of $154,000.00 and generate Capital of $575,000.00. This is attributed to initiation fees of $350,000.00 and 10% of outside golf to generate an additional $225,000.00.

Compared to the prior financial impact the Club dues are not as aggressive but the Club can still generate additional Capital and run operations for the Club.

Mr. Case provided feedback that the Club is comparing its 2022 numbers to the competitions 2021 numbers so the UPCC comparison is likely significantly better than it is depicted. Ms. Evans noted the UPCC was comparing itself to private clubs and received feedback that members would like to see a competitive comparison to clubs that were more similar to the UPCC.

Mr. Case asked about the estimated financial impact. Mr. Fetsick said the UPCC took about a $300,000.00 hit by rolling back memberships from levels presented earlier. Ms. Fetsick noted there will be cost increases to the operations of the Club.

Mr. Ludmerer provided positive comments about the plan. It aligns with the Mission and Vision of the Club. It is competitive. The revised fee structure responds to the HOA concerns on Resident Membership and mitigates sharp increases. It begins to address the need for a Capital Ledger to address the long term operating and capital reserves

necessary to move the UPCC forward. He provided feedback about the estimated financial impact.

Another Board member commented the UPCC will need to look at additional funding sources. Mr. Fetsick stated he will be undertaking a Capital Study and look into the near- term capital needs for the Club and list all the properly, plant and equipment on site, identify the useful life, and replacement value. They are confident in the recommendations today and the Capital Ledger they present in a year will support what they are recommending today.

Ms. Pagano praised Ms. Evans and Mr. Fetsick on their presentation. Ms. Dickson echoed Ms. Pagano. She noted there continues to be feedback from Full Members who are single and she is disappointed the percentage they will be paying compared to a family is still in the 75% range. She would like to try to find a way to lower single membership fees. Mr. Fetsick noted the UPCC is right at or below most of the ratios of its competition.

Mr. Case opened the floor for public comments.

Mr. Brooks provided feedback about the flexibility. He asked which other Clubs are paying
$1,000.00 RD fee to own the Club and was it taken into account. Mr. Fetsick stated other communities have a range of other charges including CDD charges and it is a burden they are carrying that we are not. Mr. Ludmerer commented on CDD dues of other communities in the area. Mr. Fetsick is looking at what it cost to live in University Park Recreation District.

Mr. Charlesworth thanked the Chair and RD Board. He is currently a sports member and asked if social members will be able to get advanced booking time as compare with the General public. Ms. Evans stated it will remain the same as it is now for a sports member who adds on a Golf Players Card or receive a 10% discount. The Club will take their tee times within the same timeframe as a current sports member. An 18-hole pass was created as well as a 9 hole player’s card pass. A discussion took place regarding the various add on options. Mr. Charlesworth added if there will be summer memberships any longer. Ms. Evans stated that will be a question for some time after the Summer Membership Program ends.

Mr. Klein asked how the $750.00 pickleball fee was calculated. Mr. Fetsick based the fee on playing 3 days per week for 50 weeks which is $5.00 per session. The UPCC has an investment in building pickleball and the program and facilities planned to provide will be similar to the Mission, Vision, and Core Values.

Mr. Klein asked if Mr. Fetsick considered the impact of the $750.00 on the ability to attract current members and future homeowners and did that impact the thinking about Food & Beverages associated with socialization following pickleball. Ms. Evans responded to his

question. It was priced based on the experience the Club thought it would be providing its members and not trying to compete with a public facility. Adding on the cost of Food & Beverage is part of the cost of membership.

Mr. John V. commented on the element of operational expense control. He asked to hear how the Club will reduce expenses. Mr. DiPaolo noted it’s the position of the Board not to get into the specifics of operations. The performance of the Club is far outpacing the budget that was originally approved. All the expenses are reviewed and brought to the attention of management for appropriate action. Mr. Ludmerer noted he sat in meetings with Ms. Evans and Mr. Neal, and Mr. Varrah in management of the Club. He noted Mr. Neal did not spend a penny more than necessary. When the UPRD inherited the Club, expenses were very well controlled. Club Benchmarking LLC has noted that the maximum expense improvement that any club can achieve is 7%, such that a 20% improvement results in 1.4% savings. Club management should deal at that level and meet budget. The real focus must be on member value. Ms. Evans commented on expenses. It is part of the day to day business. It has been a challenging year and certain expenses are not inline with the line item budget but these are extraordinary expenses related to COVID testing, sanitation supplies, cost of goods, etc.

Ms. Dickson asked about flexible options and sees no reference to croquet. Ms. Evans commented anyone can play croquet as a social member or any other class of membership. The Club chose not to make an adjustment in the long standing policy regarding croquet. It would be for the Board to decide if a change was needed if the Club eventually gets a full size croquet court.

Mr. Pearson thanked the Board for their work. He questions the trail fee. A 25% increase is proposed and asked for the thought process behind the increase. Mr. Fetsick noted the trail fee had not been adjusted in many years. Cart fees have increased and the trail fee stayed static. The shift of the number of rounds from a member has greatly increased. As Member rounds increase the cost per round for the trail fee decreases. This increase is in reaction to getting the trail fee in line with competition and more balance from a Member and Club value perspective. Mr. Pearson does not see a big advantage as a member to pay a trail fee.

Ms. Wyatt thanked the Board. She provided feedback about the Membership categories in the Bylaws. How are the new definitions of memberships will translate to the bylaws and how it will impact the rules and regulations going forward. She asked if pickleball will be included with the definition of Full Membership. Ms. Evans responded yes and the UPCAI will be redoing all the bylaw documents this summer. Ms. Wyatt asked about the corporate membership Ms. Evans stated 20 years ago the UPCC had two corporate memberships. It was cost prohibitive and difficult to manage. Ms. Wyatt asked who is responsible for making changes to the bylaws. Ms. Evans stated it is the UPCAI that is

responsible of changing the Governing Documents and Bylaws of the HOA. The UPRD is looking into amending the Charter that governs the Recreation District.

Ms. Edwards had a question regarding the dining 20% discount for Members. If someone is dining with a non-member and they pick up the check do they get the 20% discount. Ms. Evans said yes. Ms. Edward thanked the Board.

Mr. Brian S. had a question regarding membership attrition and the numbers on the financial impact slide. Mr. Fetsick wanted to represent additional attrition the Club may see or feel because of the increased dues. In general the Club membership is static or better but he wanted to represent worst, likely, and best case scenarios as examples. Mr. Brian S. encouraged Mr. Fetsick to create a 5- year plan. Mr. Fetsick noted the membership is pretty full. The Club wants to get a few members but there will not be a dramatic increase. He expects the membership will continue to be stable.

Ms. Damm stated she is disappointed that the Club is ignoring the single full members who have no way to share the experience with others but they are still paying 76% of the Family dues and the trail fee will be 80%. She noted she cannot share her golf cart with anyone and use it only when she can play. She commented the trail fee should be 50% or to let her continue at the old rate.

Ms. Becky S. thanked the Club for responding to her email concerns. She asked about the ideal number of full memberships for a Club to be sustainable. A lengthy discussion took place. There are currently around 300 full memberships and with the consideration of public play the District is operating at approximately 500 Membership. As the District adds full memberships there are less available times for public golf. The numbers that were provided to the UPCC in 2004 suggested 600 Full Memberships would be 100% capacity. That was when the UPCC was attempting to take the Club private.

Ms. Becky S. asked if current Full Members who live outside the community pay a non- resident trail fee that is more expensive than a regular trail fee. Ms. Evans said yes. Mr. Fetsick noted it is being increased. Ms. Becky S. doesn’t understand the rational for a non- resident member to have to pay any extra usage fee.

Ms. Kris Pizzi. thanked the Board. She asked how many tennis players the court can support in a full day and will outside play be considered for tennis. Mr. Ludmerer stated in most cases, the Club allows outside play as guests but there is not a lot of outside play. Schools and other groups have been invited to use the courts in the afternoon when there may be time available. Ms. Evans discussed the tennis program.

Dr. Marquet thanked the Board. He provided feedback regarding taking into consideration Article 17 of the HOA CCR. There are some restrictions about changing the Resident Social Membership fees. Mr. Case remerged that article and early on in the process it was

discussed by Mr. Fetsick and Ms. Evans about factoring in those considerations under the CCR regarding how to adjust the rates consistent with CCR requirements. They have been adjusted. Mr. Fetsick responded to the CCR requirements and did the calculation as required and worked with Mr. Whyte and Mr. Lockhorn and the HOA to ensure the increases were within those constraints. The dues recommending are below those limits. Dr. Marquet. asked the Board to get the HOA to change Article 17 of the HOA CCR.

Mr. Ludmerer provided comments about the Mutual Cooperation Agreement. Dr Marquet stated the Memorandum of Agreement does not supersede the CCR.

Mr. Ruben asked about the monthly Operations Recovery Surcharge. Ms. Evans noted that is to be discussed next on the agenda.

Ms. B.K. M. thanked the Board. She commented the residents pay taxes through the property tax for the RD. Those non-resident members do not pay that tax so she feels there should be something done to make it more equitable because they are still enjoying the same Amenities of the residents. Ms. Evans stated they do pay a non-resident trail fee. She noted this topic may be something to discuss for next year. Ms. Fetsick noted the investment in bonds will yield a higher sales price in the home if it is sold. Ms. Evans noted increasing fees for non-resident members could cause the Club to lose them.

Mr. Jaffe asked about the reciprocal agreement the Club previously has with other clubs. Ms. Evans stated a number of years ago Bird Key Yacht Club ended the agreement they were overextended in the number of members they had, and it was not to the benefit of the UPCC. They chose not to continue the reciprocal agreement with UPCC. The same thing happened with Sarasota Yacht Club. Long Boat Key Club chose not to participate in a reciprocal agreement this summer either. Mr. Jaffe had another question about that agreement and Ms. Evans asked him to call her offline so she can explain it to him.

Ms. Gail Klein proposed pickleball be an amenity to social users. She does not think the current players would be willing to pay the $750.00 fee for pickleball. A discussion took place regarding offering different options for pickleball.

Mr. Case closed the Public Hearing.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 11, Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining
Membership Categories and Amounts

The Board reviewed Resolution 2021-11. There is a rule attached to the Resolution which was amended. The effective date of the rule is January 1, 2022. The current fees continue until that date.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2021-11, Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure Pertaining Membership Categories and Amounts.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 12, Regarding Terminating of Additional Operation
Recovery Surcharge

Ms. Evans stated the Management Team for UPCC feels confident the financial position is such and the performance up to now is adequate enough to recommend the Board suspend the Additional Operation Recovery Surcharge beginning June 1, 2021.

ON MOTION by Mr. Case, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2021-12, Regarding Terminating the Operation Recovery Surcharge.

The meeting recessed at 11:42 a.m. and reconvened at 11:52 a.m.

Ms. Case provided some comments on the Master Plan. It is a guide and framework for the UPCC. There is no commitment to put pickleball in any specific location and there won’t be until the UPCC has reviewed appropriate sites and cost estimates. Mr. Case opened the floor for public comments regarding the Master Plan.

Ms. Van Brunt provided feedback about placement of pickleball and discussed of a petition from over 275 residents. She asked if any Board Member would vote against doing a site- specific study before building pickleball. Mr. Ludmerer thinks parcel L should be a consideration for pickleball. Mr. Case stated Parcel L is not an option per the approval of

the Master Plan by the Board. Ms. Van Brunt asked the Board if they would rescind their vote to exclude Parcel L for consideration for pickleball site. A lengthy discussion took place about the placement of the pickleball. Other residents stated Parcel L should be included in the study for the appropriate pickleball sites and cost estimates. Mr. Ludmerer noted he was surprised when over 275 people raised their hand asking for reconsideration of Parcel L as a location for pickleball. Mr. Ludmerer provided comments about Parcel L and its use as the location of pickleball.

Mr. Charlesworth provided feedback about the noise disturbance with pickleball. He asked the reasons for the Board’s decision. Mr. Case stated it is the most expensive option and it will take a long time to implement. Sound is also an issue. A lengthy discussion took place. Disagreements arose regarding the removal of a location for optional pickleball. Mr. Charlesworth noted there may be opportunities to sample different locations for pickleball in the for the community to put minds at ease and help with decision making.

Mr. DiPaolo discussed the noise levels of pickleball. Mr. DiPaolo asserted that research studies that have been done similar with the UPCC the decibel level of pickleball is 60-70 decibels. The Manatee County code for noise is 60-65 decibels. The mitigation affects indicated with one level of material the UPCC can reduce noise levels by 10 decibels and reduce what is heard by approximately 50%. He went on to say the Board is bound to abide by the Mission, Vision and Core Values. Which state the commitment to preserving the natural landscape considering the environmental impact of Board decisions. He doesn’t think the District needs experts to tell the UPCC that the best location for pickleball is the Tennis Court area. He does not agree Parcel L is a good location based on the UPCC Core Values.

Mr. Whyte provided feedback about pickleball. He noted there are opposing facts and he would like to see the facts gathered and a decision made based on the facts. The Board received feedback from residents and members in support of Parcel L as a location of pickleball. A urged the Board to listen to the feedback before putting themselves in a position to exclude Parcel L as an option to evaluate. Mr. Whyte offered the Board the following 6 criteria.
Best Pickleball experience
Most cost-effective solution
Least impact on other Club activities
Best noise mitigation
Most positive impact of the Club canvas
Best protection for natural environment

None of the locations are ideal but the UPCC needs an agreed way to evaluate, so the residents and members support the Board. He requested the Board reinclude Parcel L for evaluation.

A homeowner stated if pickleball is located in Parcel L the noise while individuals are eating will not be a problem. There will not be pickleball noise at lunch or dinner.

Mr. Carlin provided feedback about croquet. it is a growing sport. If the UPCC has a good croquet court it would have more members and people joining. He requested the Board focus on croquet.

Ms. Carol Shabe provided feedback about seeking professional opinions before making a decision on location of pickleball. She asked the Board to reconsider their decision and put Parcel L back into consideration. She thanked the Board for everything they have done.

Mr. Conroy sent a letter to the Board expressing thoughts and concerns about the work underway on the Club Master Plan. He thanked the Board Members who responded directly. He requested his letter become part of the public record. He discussed the history of the UPRD. It was an army of volunteer residents who got the UPRD where it is today. The UPRD is now close to realizing one of the many opportunities generated by the collective work, the opportunity to refresh the Club. Most residents he spoke with are excited about the themes and concepts presented in the Master Plan. There are concerns that the Board took a premature vote to eliminate the development of Parcel L. The decision was made in direct conflict with recommendations by the chosen Master Planner and the official statement from the UPCAI Board. The Board seemed to have also closed down the opportunity to bring in additional expert testimony.

Mr. Conroy also discussed the timetable. An incremental approach to implementation to draw the final plan out several years and compromise much of the campus. Leaking out additional funding by raising member rates and fees might be justified in the short term but long term it is an exercise in mediocrity and will erode support with a majority of loyal members. He discussed a supplementary bond issue in this favorable bond market might provide affordable funding at a cost of a few 100 additional dollars per year per resident. He requested the Board to investigate this when they have a finalized plan and total cost estimate. The UPCC needs leadership the most from this Board by listening to leading experts and residents that bring individual expertise.

Mr. Gio Cantarella discussed the fact that the Board heard from 250 residents and the UPCAI. He stated all the residents want are the facts, which is what the petition signed by 250 plus residents requested. He urged the Board to be receptive to expert facts on all the elements of the Master Plan, and not individual opinions. The Master Plan should be regularly reviewed and updated as it evolves. He requested the Board to rescind the hold on Parcel L and get the facts.

Ms. Kris Pizzi asked the Board to save the natural beauty of Parcel L. Once they cut down the natural oak trees that area can never recover. If pickleball doesn’t pan out to be everything the UPCC thinks it is, those trees are gone forever.

Ms. Joyce stated if the Board gets an expert to come in will it be a pickleball expert, a construction expert, a noise abatement expert, an environmental expert, or risk management expert.

Mr. Ludmerer stated the Board has heard the views of the community and the UPCAI. The Board would look for an expert who has built the pickleball courts in a wide variety of environments. It would include someone who converted a tennis court or converted a treed area and worked on areas of questionable drainage to come in and give the UPCC an estimate and include Parcel L.

Mr. Ludmerer asked the Board Members why they object to that expertise in making their decision. Mr. DiPaolo stated he spent 100s of hours and find no valid reason for using Parcel L based on other options that are available. It is 4 ½ acres of unspoiled property and no real reason to use it. The UPRD had 1,200 households vote over a year ago to go into debt for 30 years for the sole purpose of stopping development and he does not understand why there is a need to develop 4 ½ acres when the UPCC has other options. It offers no sound, aesthetic, or safety advantage.

Mr. Ludmerer thinks the information that would come from an expert is valuable and the Board owes it to the community to assess the opinion before making a final decision. Mr. Case stated he would never support this and thinks an expert would say the most viable place for pickleball would be to remove some of the tennis courts. He noted an expert would inform the Board the best location for pickleball. Mr. Ludmerer would like to see Parcel L included in that evaluation.

Mr. Bonder stated 276 people are for Parcel L to be considered for development. That is only 10% of the population. He believes Parcel L should be left the way it is. It is a sound issue for the community across the water.

Mr. Case stated the Board will use the best resources it can to evaluate sites which may be appropriate for pickleball in this campus. Mr. Case directed Ms. Evans to develop RFPs based on the available locations for pickleball which the Board discussed and the guidance from the Contractors who respond the RFPs. Ms. Evans will do an RFP process and ask the Contractors to make recommendations for pickleball courts at University Park. She will list the available locations that could potentially be used for pickleball.

Mr. Barnebey noted there are a lot of potential options for the placement of pickleball. Doing an RFP for the contractors at this point is not an appropriate next step. He thinks Fawley Bryant should look at this issue in more detail given the range of options or another

expert. The Contractors are not the proper people to make a decision for the location of pickleball. The number of people that have spoken in this meeting and petition is significant. All the comments are legitimate. He does not think it will sway anyone if the Board puts in Parcel L to look at. It does not hurt to include Parcel L. the Board should consider looking at the overall plan.

Ms. Evans will reach out to experts to determine the process to do a study and report back at the next meeting. Mr. Case stated he thinks that is appropriate. Ms. Evans asked if all possible locations could be used for the study including Parcel L as part of the study. She noted it does not mean the Board will choose Parcel L. Ms. Evans stated Mr. Whyte provided an outlined of criteria to review the information on the study possible locations for pickleball.

A homeowner stated if the study comes back with Parcel L as the most viable option for pickleball this Board still has that location eliminated. She asked if that stands. Ms. Carvalho stated the Board would have to address that decision at that point. Mr. Case stated the Board does not have to rescind the vote on the Master Plan. If motion was made to locate the Pickleball Court on Parcel L and a majority of the Board voted for it, it would be the result.

Mr. Barnebey noted the UPRD had a $1,000.00 assessment two years ago. He reported to the Board regarding the outstanding assessment. The Dowdell’s did pay the District and for their $1,000.00 assessment their payoff was $6,301.60 despite his best efforts to get them to pay well before any of that would have accrued. There is one unpaid assessment. Mr. Lester has still not paid the assessment. Mr. Lester was foreclosed on but the UPRD is still in negotiations with them. Mr. Barnebey is moving forward to set a hearing on the motion to compel the assessment to get paid. Mr. Barnebey left the meeting. Ms. Carvalho will keep him informed on any actions taken during the remainder of the meeting.

Monthly	Board	of	Supervisors Report

Mr. Case discussed the Mutual Cooperation Agreement between UPRD and UPCAI. He clarified they are two different Board with separate autonomous obligations.

He had no update regarding the Dog Park. There was no preferred site for the Dog Park. Ms. Peggy Lowndes stated there is one promising location, but she is not ready to provide that information.

Ms. Dickson stated the Marketing Group are in the process of putting together steps to deliver a marketing plan. The group is meeting tomorrow, and she is presenting a Marketing Positioning Statement for the UPRD. She outlined it includes who the RD

serves, what they offer, how they offer it, why they do what they do, and what sets the UPRD apart. The Mission, Vision and Core Values answer all of those questions. She presented her UPCC statement. Mr. Ludmerer provided feedback. Ms. Carvalho requested a copy of her UPCC marketing statement.

Mr. DiPaolo provided an update of the Financial Group. The Finance Group explored other options for raising Capital. The Commission for the Finance Group expires now and he sees no reason to renew it until the UPRD gets a little further down the road where the District can be more definitive in its plans to start that again. The Finance Group is officially over on May 1, 2021. Ms. Carvalho stated the Finance Group could advertise to extend through May. The Financial Group has been working on the budget and may have to opportunity to meet next Tuesday and review the highlights of the Budget. Mr. DiPaolo will work with Mr. Barnebey this week on a number of areas and hope to have a draft of the Charter ready for consideration at the May meeting for the Board to review and discuss. The UPRD may be able to pursue other income opportunities that may require statutory changes. He will be able to report on those next month.

Ms. Pagano received photos and content that is being developed for the website revamp. A suggestion was made to include an area on the website for important current issues. Ms. Pagano noted a few months ago she implemented a search feature. Mr. Case suggested important information to be placed in an area easy to access. Ms. Carvalho noted the website has a section of highlighted information. Ms. Pagano and the Board can determine the Master Plan or the topic of the pickleball. Ms. Pagano stated the District can’t put anything on the site until it’s in its final form. Ms. Carvalho stated the minutes will not go on the website until they have been approved by the Board at the next meeting. If anyone wants to see a draft of the minutes prior to Board approval they need to contact the District Manager office. A lengthy discussion took place regarding how to make information easier to find. A common landing page is being created that will link the UPCC, UPCAI, and UPRD so the public can have one place to access the various websites. The Friday Email came into existence to communicate important topics. The Emails that residents respond to are the singular emails that are sent regarding a specific event. There is a lot of information now due to the pickleball issue and the Master Plan.

Mr. Ludmerer had no new items to discuss.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business Staff Reports
District Counsel- Mr. Barnebey provided his report earlier, prior to leaving the meeting.

District Engineer- Not Present.

District Manager- Ms. Carvalho stated the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 will be considered at the May meeting.

General Manager & Director of Finance Report

Management Discussion & Analysis Report

Ms. Evans provided her report. The Food & Beverage Team is working hard to reinvent themselves now that the impact of COVID-19 is diminishing. They are discussing and plan to bring back a Sunday Buffet for Mother’s Day. A COVID-19 safe event is being planned. The next step is to bring back Sunday Buffets each Sunday and Monday Buffets.

Golf revenue continues to be beyond anything they expected now the UPCC is into the Summer Membership Season. The UPCC sells out every day which is why the Club dropped the surcharge.

Ms. Evans was concerned about increasing the price of Summer Membership, but it is already outpacing the total number of Summer Membership sales from 2018. Last year was a record-breaking year with 235 Summer Memberships. The UPCC is in excess of 175 Summer Memberships thus far as of April 15, 2021.

Mr. Ludmerer asked if the UPCC was planning anything for Memorial Day. Ms. Evans stated the Club will likely have a buffet. If anyone is uncomfortable eating at the buffet they will be allowed to go in advance or staff can put together a to-go box to take home.

Mr. Fetsick reported golf operations continue to be very strong. The restaurant is doing the best within the constraints of COVID-19. A la cart dining and special event have been strong offset by the lack of banquet events and buffets. The P&L continues to pace as it has over the last couple of months. He is working on the UPCC Budget and gotten great input from Department Heads and staff and moving forward to complete the Budget in advance of the May meeting. The Audit is ongoing, and he has a call today at 3:00 p.m. to discuss the audit. Park Boulevard Management got the PPP Loan and has successfully filed an application for forgiveness. Mr. Case asked about the Audit. He asked if the UPRD could have the audit completed by June 30, 2021. Mr. Fetsick stated the UPRD must have it completed by June 30, 2021. Ms. Carvalho explained the Audit has to be filed with the State before June 30, 2021.

Mr. Fetsick presented Payment Authorizations #43-45. These are standard monthly operating expenses for the Recreation District. He discussed the Annual Trustee Fee paid to US Bank. It was not included in the budget and it will go against the contingency, but it

is an expense that will continue for the life of the bond and is a percentage of the debt remaining. He will ensure it is included in the budget going forward.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Board ratified Payment Authorizations #43-45.

Ms. Evans discussed the status of Phase 1 Improvements. The UPCC has an RFP developed for the Grille and Restaurant projects. Ms. Carvalho made adjustments to the dates. Ms. Carvalho asked if the goal is to consider the RFP at the May meeting. Ms. Evans and Ms. Carvalho will discuss this outside of the meeting. The goal is to give two weeks for a response and if the District were to proceed now they do not have that timeframe.

Mr. Ludmerer stated Mr. Case noted the expansion and widening of the cart path as an expansion of Phase 1 and it was not part of the Phase 1 the Board approved. The Board may need to modify that if they want to include it as a priority. Pickleball was in the Phase 1 priority. Mr. Case will review that.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor Requests

Ms. Evans stated information was shared that she was potentially resigning. She clarified that she has no plans to resign effective today or tomorrow however it is important to know that she has made the decision to retire and she will be retiring close to the end of the year. She does not have a date certain. PBM will conduct a search for her replacement which will take place quickly and there will be ample time to find the right person.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Mr. Case requested a motion to adjourn the meeting at 1:30 p.m.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Friday, April 20, 2021 Continued Board of Supervisors’ Meeting for University Park Recreation District was adjourned at 1:30 p.m.

 	
Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairperson / Vice Chairperson

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of the Minutes of the May 14, 2021 Board of Supervisors Meeting

MINUTES OF MEETING
UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
Friday May 14, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. University Park Varsity Club
7671 The Park Blvd, University Park, FL 32401

Board Members present at roll call:
James Case	Chairperson
Steve Ludmerer	Vice Chairperson
Sally Dickson	Assistant Secretary
Karen Pagano	2nd Vice Chairperson
Bill DiPaolo	Treasurer

Also, Present:
Vivian Carvalho		District Manager - PFM Group Consulting, LLC Venessa Ripoll	Assistant District Manager-PFM Group Consulting, LLC (via zoom)
Mark Barnebey	District Counsel- Blalock Walters Law Firm Laurie Evans	General Manager- Country Club
Curtis Nickerson	Director of Properties & Facilities- Country Club
John Fetsick	Director of Finance- Country Club	(via zoom) Rico Alcala	Club Operations Director
Various Members of the General Public	(present and via zoom)

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Call to Order and Roll Call

The meeting was called to order at 1:03 p.m. by Mr. Case. Ms. Carvalho confirmed quorum to proceed with the meeting. Those in attendance are outlined above.

Mr. Case lead the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. He requested a moment of silence to remember those individuals who the community recently lost.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Business Matters Public Comments
There are no public comments at this time.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 9, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 9, 2021, Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the March 30, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the March 30, 2021, Finance Volunteer Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 6, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 6, 2021, Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 13, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 13, 2021, Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting. Mr. Ludmerer noted Ms. Evans was present at the meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 20, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 20, 2021, Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 27, 2021 Finance

Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 27, 2021, Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meeting. Ms. Ludmerer noted Ms. Evans was present at the meeting.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the March 9, 2021, March 30, 2021, April 6, 2021, April 13, 2021,
April 20, 2021, and April 27, 2021 Finance Volunteer Group Workshop Meetings, as amended.

Consideration of the Minutes of the April 9, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 9, 2021, Board of Supervisors’ Meeting. Mr. Ludmerer provided feedback on the minutes and changes. There was much concern regarding the minutes as they were written. The minutes before the Board include Mr. Ludmerer’s revisions. This item will be tabled for consideration at the next meeting.
Consideration of the Minutes of the April 20, 2021 Continuation of the Board of Supervisors Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the April 20, 2021, Continued Board of Supervisors’ Meeting held on April 20, 2021. Mr. Ludmerer provided feedback regarding the minutes. Page 14 indicated Resolution 2021-10 was approved unanimously. Ms. Carvalho will go back and review the recording and page 14 of the minutes. A discussion took place. Mr. Ludmerer asked each Board Member to request a draft of the minutes to read through them and provide feedback to Ms. Carvalho. Ms. Carvalho will provide a draft of the minutes to the Board of the minutes prior to the preliminary agenda going out. By the time the agenda goes out the comments will be incorporated. The minutes will be tabled for consideration until the next meeting.

Consideration of the Minutes of the May 4, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting

The Board reviewed the minutes of the May 4, 2021, Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Ms. Dickson with all in favor, the Board approved the Minutes of the May 4, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Workshop Meeting as presented.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 13, Approving a Preliminary Enterprise Fund (Country Club) Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 and Setting a Public Hearing Date
Exhibit A- Enterprise Fund (Country Club) Budget

District staff suggested August 13, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. as the public hearing date for the final adoption of the budget at this location. Mr. Ludmerer would have to be present via zoom during that meeting.

Mr. Fetsick presented the Preliminary Enterprise Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2022. He noted there had been no changes since the workshop.

ON MOTION by Mr. Ludmerer, seconded by Ms. Pagano, with all in favor, the Board approved Resolution 2021-13, Approving a Preliminary Enterprise Fund (Country Club) Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 and Setting August 13, 2021, as the Public Hearing Date at this location at 1:00PM.

Consideration of Resolution 2021- 14, Approving a Preliminary General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 and Setting a Public Hearing Date
Exhibit A- General Fund Budget
Exhibit B- Debt Service Budget

District staff suggested August 13, 2021 at this location at 1:00 p.m. as the public hearing date for the final adoption of the budget. Mr. Ludmerer would have to attend via zoom that week and the following.

Mr. Fetsick presented the General Fund Budget and the Debt Service Budget for Fiscal Year 2022. He noted there had been no changes since the workshop.

Mr. Ludmerer asked if the District can have the public hearing and make the final approval on the same date. Mr. Barnebey stated the District could adopt the budget on the same date as the public hearing. Ms. Carvalho added there is a requirement per Statute in which the Preliminary Enterprise Fund, General Fund, and Debt Service Budgets must be sent to the County of jurisdiction 60 days prior to the public hearing date.

Mr. Ludmerer asked if the Debt Service Budget is consistent with the Bond and the District’s obligations. Ms. Carvalho and Mr. Fetsick confirmed that it was consistent.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Board approved the Resolution 2021-14, Approving a Preliminary General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 and Setting August 14, 2021 at this location at 1:00 p.m. as the Public Hearing Date.

Letter from Supervisors of Elections- Manatee County

Ms. Carvalho explained this is a requirement per statute. Each year the District is required to state on the record the number of registered voters living within the District. Ms. Carvalho noted if and when this District changes the Charter for the election process this information will be essential to notate for the record keeping.

Mr. Barnebey noted this would be important when the District does a referendum on any Charter changes because that is done by Electors.

Mr. DiPaolo indicated the Board already agreed how they would like to hold their Elections. The only time the District will use this will be for the approval of the Charter Amendments.

A discussion took place regarding the process of having a referendum on the November ballot. The Supervisor of Elections indicated if there was an Election, the District could utilize them for a Referendum and Charter Amendments.

Mr. Case indicated that Board would review the Charter at the next workshop and approve it as a Board at the following meeting and then work on the process of getting it to the Supervisor of Elections. Mr. Ludmerer noted there is a deadline of August 11, 2021, to get on the ballot a proposed Referendum. Mr. Mantia provided some insight regarding the Election. A discussion took place referencing how the Board approved in concept the manner in which the District would like to run its Elections.

ON MOTION by Mr. Case, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board accepted the Letter from the Supervisor of Elections- Manatee County.

Update on the Website Development with the UPCAI

Ms. Evans provided an update of the website and reviewed the photos for the website. The combined website which joins the UPCAI, UPCC, UPRD websites will be linked by the landing page, previously discussed. The UPCAI website will take some time.

Mr. Ludmerer asked how the cost of the website and upgrade will be allocated between UPCAI and UPRD. Ms. Evans replied the HOA and UPRD would split the cost of the photoshoot but it is unclear how the other website development piece will be split. No action is required by the Board.

Update of FY 2020 Audit Report

Mr. Fetsick explained the Audit Report is due by June 30, 2021. It has been slower than normal as this is the first year of the Recreation District. Phillips Harvey Group will be on the site next week to do internal controls and interviews with the Management Team. The District will get a first draft of the Audit Report in early June. The next Board meeting is scheduled for June 11, 2021 but he does not think the Audit Report will be done by that time.

Mr. Barnebey suggested the Board continue the meeting on June 11, 2021 to a date certain so they do not have to readvertise a meeting. Mr. Fetsick will provide an update to the Board by next week with the timeframes.

Update of the Phase 1 RFP Master Improvement Plan Project

Ms. Evans provided an update on the phase 1 RFP Master Improvements Plan Project. There is a technical issue with the RFP for Interior Design and Continuing Services and the District needs to issue an amendment. The RFP went out with wording that this was a continuing services proposal and it is not a continuing services contract. He and Ms. Evans will work together on the amendment to the RFP. Mr. Barnebey stated it should be readvertised in case there is someone who did not apply because they thought it was a continuing contract.

Ms. Evans stated there had been a total of 5 companies that have requested the RFP Construction Firms bidding on the Construction aspect of the project. Ms. Carvalho will send Mr. Barnebey the ad so he can modify it accordingly.

Consideration of Amendment to the Water Agreement with UPCAI

Mr. Barnebey provided an update of the conversation with UPCAI Counsel. The water rights for the lake the District is using will continue to be nominal. Mr. Ludmerer requested a redline version and a clean version of the agreement for review when provided to the Board. Mr. Barnebey will bring this back to the Board at the next meeting.

Monthly Board of Supervisors Reports

Mr. Case- Topics are UPCAI coordination with the Recreation District.
Mr. Case provided a draft letter and asked the Board to review some of the requested changes as it relates to CC&R for the community. He suggested repealing the grandfather provision at the end of December 2023. He also asked UPCC to eliminate the transfer provision. He stated it would require residents who are not required to become Members to become Social Resident Members of the Country Club. He suggested this requirement across the board to every homeowner of University Park.

Mr. DiPaolo stated the impact of the elimination of that provision for the Club would be about $200,000 per year which would put the District in a better position to meet the Capital needs. He was in favor of the proposed changes suggested by Mr. Case. Mr. Ludmerer supports eliminating the grandfather provision. He stated there are more than 150 members who will be impacted. Ms. Dickson is also in favor. Furthermore, she stated the date is adequate time for residents to adjust. Ms. Pagano is in favor, but she is unsure of the date timeframe. Ms. Evans commented that there may be fallout and would likely result in people selling their homes and leave University Park.

Mr. Case discussed the Landlord/Rental Provision. It will change to require every assessable lot to acquire a Membership for the Club. Currently, if one person owns multiple homes, only one membership is required. It was also noted that there is a current

provision that if someone buys a lot and leases it the tenant can enjoy the Membership rights that belong to that lot through a transfer process. UPRD has approximately 50 rentals and no more than five owned by any one landowner. The Board Members were in support of this change.

Mr. Case proposed getting rid of the current structure for making annual adjustments. The CC&R has a list of Clubs to UPCC, which is obligated to compare itself, but the list can be adjusted under certain provisions. The UPCC falls under the UPRD which is run by a Board elected by the residents and homeowners. Mr. Case proposed a maximum annual increase of 20% and a five-year maximum increase of 100%, which is less than a 20% increase year to year.

Mr. DiPaolo stated he does not think the structure of the Country Club dues should be a part of UPCAI CCRs. He noted instead of raising dues, the UPRD could have a $1,000.00 per year assessment. In this scenario, the Membership would be a benefit of UPCAI. The UPCAI and the UPRD have a Mutual Cooperation Agreement.

Mr. Ludmerer provided some historical perspectives regarding the calculation system of comparative clubs. He believed it was to protect the Developer. He suggested Exhibit B to be removed pertaining to the CC&R and revise the Mutual Cooperation Agreement to accommodate these changes

Mr. Mantia provided perspective for a future homebuyer. They are looking at the total cost of living and Membership fees in the Club.

Ms. Evans provided feedback on Mr. Ludmerer’s comments. The calculation system was set up to protect future homeowners from the encroachment on their rights by the Developer and the UPCC having unregulated access to expanding the dues beyond a reasonable level. The Board agreed with removing Exhibit B of the Mutual Cooperation Agreement.

Mr. Barnebey does not have a problem with the Board ‘s requests of the UPCAI Board and for them to look at those issues. Ms. Evans stated there are 464 total grandfathered memberships and 273 are currently members and 191 are currently non-members. Mr. Mantia stated of the 191 non-members, there are 120 had been previously members. Ms. Evans will edit the letter based on today’s discussion. She will also share it separately and individually with each Board Member for additional feedback prior to submittal to UPCAI.

Mr. DiPaolo suggested that the HOA offer within the HOA dues a Social Membership so every lot paying HOA dues would pay $1,000.00 for Social Membership. The UPCC would in tune reduce Membership dues by $1,000.00. This would go a long way in a short time, providing the UPCC the funds it needs to build up the Capital Account.

Mr. White provided feedback on Mr. DiPaolo’s comments.

Mr. Ludmerer noted there is a provision in the CC&R that there can be no amendments to the CC&R that adversely affect the interest of the owners of the Club. For example, the HOA has the responsibility for collecting any delinquent monies owed to the Country Club. Ms. Evans stated that a total of two individuals were sent to collections in 20 years that she has been part of the Club. This matter is a non-issue to the Club. A lengthy discussion took place about real estate transfer fees. Mr. Barnebey noted the Board would be discussing this at the workshop.

Ms. Dickson- Topics is Marketing
Ms. Dickson stated the goal is to have the Marketing Plan for review by June 2021. She is working with Mr. Cantarella on the plan.

Mr. DiPaolo-Topics are Finance & Charter Amendments relating to the Election and other items within the Charter to be amended.
Mr. DiPaolo stated the Board already reviewed everything that he's been working on in terms of the financial strategies to try to get additional capital resources. He is working on the Charter Amendments which will be presented at the next workshop for the Boards review.
Mr. Ludmerer-Topics are Strategic Planning and District Management Structure He stated that the Strategic Planning Group is in its sunset phase. The Master Plan is completed. The group received input into the membership revisions. He has close closed his activity with the Strategic Planning Group but will remain in the liaison position for the District Management Structure.
Ms. Pagano- Topics are Communication and Membership Structure
Ms. Pagano is meeting with Ms. Evans next week to work on the website. She stated the membership work is done for this year.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business Staff Reports
District Counsel- Mr. Barnebey provided an update about the outstanding assessment. The District assessment fees were paid, but it is uncertain if the homeowner paid off the lien. He stated the Counsel representing the homeowner is trying to figure that out as well. It appears it will be resolved, and the District will be able to release that lien. It cost the homeowner $5,600.00 to pay off the $1,000.00 original lien.

Mr. Barnebey stated the Florida Legislature had adopted some bills which may affect the District. The State is waiting for the Governor to determine if he will sign the bills. Mr. Barnebey will provide an update to the Board at the next meeting.

Gio Cantarella confirmed he is working with Ms. Dickson on the Marketing Plan. District Engineer- Not Present.
District Manager- Ms. Carvalho noted the next Board of Supervisors meeting is scheduled for June 11, 2021. The District has confirmed that a Special Workshop will be held on June 3, 2021 to review the RFP responses, which are due back on May 28, 2021. She stated proposed Amendments to the Charter wiould be provided at that time as well.

The Board discussed the potential of continuing the June 11, 2021 meeting to review the draft of the Audit. She stated the Board has a regular scheduled workshop advertised for June 29, 2021. The continued meeting will need to be scheduled between those two dates for the Audit approval. A lengthy discussion took place regarding the Audit Report.

General Manager & Director of Finance Report
a) Management Discussion & Analysis Report

Ms. Evans provided a report. In the Friday night email she is communicating to the UPCC Members that she will be reviewing COVID-related policies and coming out with a comprehensive document next week. She will review all policies in every area of the Club to match CDC Guidelines. The Club Managers Association is doing a National Survey to be completed by next week, and she is waiting to see the results.

She asked the Board if the meetings venue should continue in this location and offer zoom as an option. She recommended continuing to provide that option. Mr. Ludmerer asked the zoom audience about the audio quality. The zoom audience commented that the audio is better than it was a couple of meetings ago.

A discussion took place regarding COVID-19 vaccination of staff members. Ms. Evans stated she is not allowed to ask staff members their vaccination status due to HIPPA law and she recommends staff to continue to wear masks.

Ms. Evans discussed the future of holding Friday Night happy hour and reopen for card games and other table games. She believes this should wait a few more months until the UPCC has the card room back. A discussion took place to ask UPCAI to attempt to expedite the permitting process.

Ms. Evans explained the golf continues to be busy and have sold out every day. A discussion took place regarding golf cart sharing.

Ms. Evans discussed the dining operations. It continues to stay busy. She stated banquet business is continuing to pick up. The first Golf Tournament since the Pandemic is

scheduled for both this weekend. She stated that Mothers’ Day Buffet was well received. She stated that Monday Buffet has initiated and Sunday Brunch has initiated in the Country Club. The Special Dining nights will continue through the Summer. She reported that Summer Golf Memberships are up to 203 approaching the previous record numbers.

Ms. Evans discussed the Pickleball Special Interest Group which includes Mac McDevitt, Mr. Siegel, Joyce Giberti, Mr. Nickerson, Mr. Fetsick, and Ms. Evans. They identified 9 areas for possible pickleball court locations. They contracted a sound study next week by Keane Acoustics. The Pickleball Special Interest Group is looking at all associated factors that will be important when considering the location of the pickleball court and a Preliminary Report will be presented at the June 11, 2021 Board Meeting.

General Manager & Director of Finance – Mr. Fetsick stated golf operations continue to be great. He stated year to date through April 30, 2021 the UPCC has 7,700 more rounds which are 3,931 rounds from the outside and 3,780 more member rounds. In the last two months the UPCC had exceeded the Budget in the restaurant. He discussed the Summer Memberships. He stated the Initiation fees and membership dues for the month are exceeding the Budget. A discussion took place and Mr. Ludmerer gave credit to the Management Team of Food and Beverage in the Club. Ms. Evans gave kudos to Rico Alcala as well.

Mr. Fetsick presented Payment Authorizations #46-48. These are general normal District expenses for legal, PFM, and Audit fees. He requested ratification as presented.

ON MOTION by Mr. DiPaolo, seconded by Mr. Ludmerer, with all in favor, the Board ratified Payment Authorizations #46-48.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor Requests

There were no Supervisor requests.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

Mr. Case requested a motion to adjourn the meeting at 3:06 p.m.

ON MOTION by Ms. Dickson, seconded by Mr. DiPaolo, with all in favor, the Friday, May 14, 2021 Board of Supervisors’ Meeting for University Park Recreation District was continued at 3:06 p.m.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairperson / Vice Chairperson

University Park Recreation District

Pickleball Advisory Volunteer Group Presentation

University Park Recreation District

Update on the Website Development with the UPCAI

University Park Recreation District

Review & Consideration of Phase 1 RFP Master Improvement Plan Project Proposals

University Park Recreation District

Review & Discussion of Charter Amendments

AMEND SECTION 2-8-153 to read as follows:

Sec. 2-8-153. - Elections; Board of Supervisors.

The UPRD shall be governed by a five-member Board of Supervisors elected by the Owners and Residents. The initial election of Supervisors is scheduled to take place at the Lakeside Room at the University Park Country Club, 7671 The Park Blvd., University Park, FL 34201 on Monday , September 17, 2018 v1ith proxy submissions beginning at 9:00 a.m., and the election to be held at 3:00 p.m. Notice of the initial election and subsequent elections shall be published once a week for 2 consecutive weeks in a newspaper which is in general circulation in the area of the UPRD, the last day of such publication to be not fewer than 14 days or more than 28 days before the date of the election. The Owners and Residents, when assemb le d, shall  organize  by electing a chair who shall conduct the election. The chair may be any person present at the meeting . At the initial and second election, each Owner or Resident shall be entitled to one vote per parcel for each of up to five nominated candidates. Beginning with the thiffl-2022 election and at each election thereafter,_eac h resident, who has registered with the Dist1ict at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the election, and each Owner shall be entitled to one vote per board seat. Beginning with the 2022 election, the Board of Supervisors may appoint a non-supervisor resident to coordinate and conduct the election. Beginning with the 2022 election an<l each election thereafter. candidates of the Office of Supervisor shall file with the District Manager for the seat for which the candidate is running. The filing period hall tem1inate 60 days prior to the date of the election which shall be set by the Board.  Provided  ho, v ever , no Owner may vote if there is a Resident residing at Owner's address within the UPRD unless such Owner has received a proxy from such Resident. An Owner or Resident may vote in person ef- by proxy in writing, or bv uch other means as pennitted by law. Each proxy must be signed by one of the Owners or Residents of the property for which the vote is cast and must contain the typed or printed name of the individual who signed the proxy and the street address, legal description of the property, or tax parcel identification number. The signature on a proxy need not be notarized. Upon the conclusion of the period for the casting of votes on the election day. the results shall be announced at a public meeting upon the conclusion of the counting.

At the initial and second elections, the five candidates receiving the most votes shall be elected. Beginning with the third election and at each election thereafter, the candidate receiving the most votes for each seat in any election  shall be elected. The term of office for each successful candidate commences upon election. If, during the term of office, a vacancy occurs, the remaining members of the Board shall fill the vacancy by an appointment  for the remainder of the

unexpired term. Supervisors shall hold office for the terms for which they were elected or appointed and until their successors are chosen and qualified. If no Resident qualifies  for a seat to be filled  in an election, a vacancy  in  that seat shall be declared by the Board effective on the second Tuesday following the election. Within 90 days thereafter, the Board shall use its best efforts to identify and appoint a Resident to fill the vacancy . Until such appointment, the incumbent Supervisor in that seat shall remain in office.

The Supervisors elected at the first election shall each serve a one year term. At the second election, the two candidates receiving the first and second highest  vote totals shall serve three year terms, the two candidates  receiving the third and fourth highest vote totals shall serve two year terms, and the candidate receiving the fifth highest vote total shall serve a one year term. At all subsequent elections, each Supervisor shall be elected  to a three year term.  Any tie in the number of votes cast for a Supervisor seat shall be resolved by a coin flip.

To facilitate the Board' s usage of the Supervisor of Elections  during a general  election  year, the Board shall have the power by adoption of a resolution to shorten or lengthen all terms of office at the same time and change the terms of office to Tenn of office for Supervisors shall be for four year staggered terms with three seats being filled in an even-numbered  year (in  2027) and two seats being filled in the next even-numbered year (2024).

Elections shall be nonpartisan.

The cost of elections for the Board shall be borne by the UPRD.

The Board shall use and rely upon the official records maintained by the Manatee County Supervisor of Elections, Property Appraiser and/or Tax Collector in making the determination of whether a person qualifies as an Owner or Resident-entitled to vote in an election of the Board.

Upon entering into office, Supervisors shall take and subscribe to the oath of office as prescribed by section 876.05, Florida Statutes.

There shall be a limit of three consecutive terms, and a total limit of four terms, for each person elected as a Supervisor.

G)	Supervisors shall serve without compensation .

(k)   As soon as practicable after each election or appointment, the Board shall organize by electing one of its members as chair and by electing a secretary, who need not be a Supervisor, and such other officers as the Board may deem necessary. The Board shall designate a person who is a resident of the state as

treasurer of the UPRD, who shall have charge of the funds of the UPRD. Such funds shall be disbursed only upon the order, or pursuant to the resolution, of the Board by warrant or check countersigned by the treasurer and by such other person as may be authorized by the Board.

(1)  The Board shall conduct regular meetings and shall periodically solicit the views of Residents and Owners as to their concerns regarding any aspect of matters within the authority or purview of the Board. The Board shall be primarily responsible for developing policy and overseeing the implementation of such policy, but in no way does this expression of intent limit the Board's powers.

(m)   A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of conducting its business, exercising its powers and for all other purposes. Action taken by the UPRD shall be upon a vote of a majority of the Supervisors present and voting unless general law or a rule of the UPRD requires a greater number.

AMEND SECTION 2-8-156 to read as follows:

Sec. 2-8-156. - Short-Term Borrowing. The UPRD at any time may obtain short­ term loans or lines of credit with a maturity of twe- five years or less, in such amount and on such terms and conditions as the Board may approve, for the purpose of paying any of the expenses of the UPRD or any costs incurred or that may be incurred in connection with any of the Projects, which loans oflines of credit shall bear such interest as the Board may determine in compliance with section 215.84, Florida Statutes, and may be payable from and secured by a pledge of such funds, revenues, taxes, and assessments as the Board may determine, subject, however, to the provisions contained in any proceeding under which Bonds were theretofore issued and are then outstanding. For the purpose of defraying such costs and expenses, the UPRD may issue negotiable notes, warrants, or other evidences of debt to be payable at such times, to bear such interest as the Board may determine in compliance with section 215.84, Florida Statutes, and to be sold or discounted at such price or prices not less than 95 percent of par value and on such terms as the Board may deem advisable. The Board shall have the right to provide for the payment thereof by pledging the whole or any part of the funds, revenues , taxes, and assessments of the UPRD. The approval by referendum of short-term loans or lines of credit shall not be necessary except when required by the Act or State Constitution. Short-term borrowing authorized pursuant to this section shall also be subject to the provisions of section 2-8-157(g).

AMEND SECTION 2-8-157 to read as follows:

Sec. 2-8-157. - Bonds.

The Board shall develop a detailed plan for the expenditure and repayment of the proceeds of each Bond issue. The repayment portion of each plan shall specify the annual amount of Bond repayment due from each Owner within the UPRD. The plan must be the subject of a referendum prior to the issuance of a proposed Bond. Provided however, no referendum shall be required for refunding Bonds. The referendum required by this section may be held on the same day as any other referendum related to the UPRD; provided that such Bonds shall bear interest at a rate pursuant to section 215.84, Florida Statutes, and be sold at public sale in accordance with law. In the event an offer of an issue of Bonds at public sale produces no bid, or in the event all bids received are rejected, or UPRD elects to sell pursuant to a private sale, the UPRD is authorized to negotiate for the sale of such Bonds under such rates and terms as are acceptable; provided that no such Bonds shall be sold or delivered on terms less favorable than the terms contained in any bids rejected at the public sale thereof or the terms contained in the notice of public sale if no bids were received at such public sale.

Bonds shall be authorized by resolution or resolutions of the Board which shall be adopted by a majority of all the Supervisors thereof then in office. Such resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds may be adopted prior to filing a complaint for validation of the Bonds, but the validation hearing shall not occur until after the referendum required by section 418.22, Florida Statutes. Such resolution or resolutions may be adopted at the same meeting at which they are introduced and need not be published or posted. Any resolution authorizing the issuance of Bonds may contain such covenants as the Board may deem advisable, and all such covenants shall constitute valid and legally binding and enforceable contracts between the UPRD and the bondholders, regardless of the time of issuance thereof. Such covenants may include, without limitation, covenants concerning the disposition of the Bond proceeds; the use and disposition of Project revenues; the pledging of revenues, taxes, and assessments; the obligations of the UPRD with respect to the operation of the Project and the maintenance of adequate Project revenues; the issuance of additional Bonds; the appointment, powers, and duties of trustees and receivers; the acquisition of outstanding Bonds and obligations; restrictions on the establishing of competing Projects or facilities; restrictions on the sale or disposal of the assets and property of the UPRD; the priority of assessment liens; the priority of claims by bondholders on the taxing power of the UPRD; the maintenance of deposits to assure the payment ofrevenues by users ofUPRD facilities and services; the discontinuance of UPRD services by reason of delinquent payments; acceleration upon default; the execution of

necessary instruments ; the procedure for amending or abrogating covenants with the bondholders; and such other covenants as may be deemed necessary or desirable for the security of the bondholders.

Any Bond issued by the UPRD, in the absence of an express recital on the face thereof that it is nonnegotiable, shall be fully negotiable and shall be and constitute a negotiable instrument.

The UPRD shall have the power to issue Bonds to provide for the retirement or refunding of any Bonds or obligations of the UPRD at any time when in the judgment of the Board such issuance will be advantageous to the UPRD.

Any two or more Projects may be combined and consolidated into a single Project and may be operated and maintained as a single Project. The Bonds authorized herein may be issued to finance any one or more of such Projects, regardless of whether or not such Projects have been combined and consolidated into a single Project. If the Board deems it advisable, the proceedings authorizing such Bonds may provide that the UPRD may thereafter combine the Projects then being financed or theretofore financed with other Projects to be subsequently financed by the UPRD, and that Bonds to be thereafter issued by the UPRD shall be on parity with the Bonds then being issued, all on such terms, conditions, and limitations as shall have been provided in the proceeding which authorized the original Bonds.

If the Board determines to issue Bonds for more than one Project, the approval of the issuance of the Bonds for all such Projects may be submitted during one referendum process. The failure of the referendum to approve the issuance of Bonds for any one or more Projects shall not defeat the approval of Bonds for any Project which has been approved in such referendum process.

All Bond issues, except for refunding bonds, shall be validated by appropriate court proceedings. No Bonds, short-term loans or lines of credit or other debt of the UPRD shall constitute debt of Manatee County or the State of Florida, and Manatee County does not make any legal representations with regard to any such indebtedness. UPRD shall be entitled to issue Bonds without the consent of the county. In furtherance thereof, the county shall not be requested to authorize any Bonds or other obligations secured by non-ad valorem assessments or taxes imposed by the UPRD pursuant to the Act or this article. The UPRD acting pursuant to the Act or this article shall not be empowered or authorized in any manner to create a debt as against the county and shall not be entitled to pledge the full faith and credit of the county in any manner whatsoever. No revenue bonds or debt obligationsof the UPRD acting pursuant to the Act shall ever pledge or imply any pledge that the county shall be obligated to pay the same or the interest thereon,

nor state or imply that such obligations are payable from the full faith and credit or the taxing power of the state or the county. The issuance of Bonds by the UPRD under the Act or this article shall not be deemed in any manner, directly or indirectly or contingently, to obligate the county to levy or to pledge any form of ad valorem taxation or other county revenues or to make any appropriation for their payment whatsoe ver.

EXHIBIT A- LEGAL DESCRIPTION

AMEND SECTION 418.21 to read as follows:
Governing body.-
(!)	The governing body of a recreation district shall be determined by ordinance of the municipality or county that created the district and must be either :
A five-member or larger board of supervisors elected from among the residents of the district, or
The governing body of the municipality or county that created the dis trict.
(2)(a) If the governing body is a board of supervis ors, the ordinance must specify the date of the election and must provide that each property owner or resident-in the district has the right to vote in the elec tion. The ordinance may also provide for the staggering of terms of the supe rvisors.
The ordinance may also provide for the establishment of designated geographic areas within the district from each of which are elected one or more memb ers of the board of supe rvisors to represent that area, provided the ordinance is made contingent on approval by a majority vote of the electors in each desig nated area. The \ Otm 0   ma be mack througJ1 casting ofa ballot b\ electronic means or \H1tten mean,.
(b)	Members of the board of supervisors shall serve without comp ensation.
If the governing body is the governing body of the municipality or county that created the district, that body may appoint a dis trict advisory board to advise it on all matters relating to the district. Members of the advisory board shall serve without comp ensation .
A!\IE D SE CT IO:\ -t18.12 to read as folloM :

Powers of recreation districts.-The charter of a recreation dis trict may grant to the recreation district the following powers and all further or additional powers as the governing body of the municipality or county establishing the district may deem ne cessary or useful in order to exercise the powers for which provision is hereinafter made. The powers which may be granted by such charter include the following :
(I)  To sue and be sued and to have a corporate seal.
To contract and be contracted with.
To acquire, purchase, const ruct, imp rove, and equip recreational facilities of all types, including real and personal property, within the boundaries of the district; such acquisition may be by purchase, le ase, gift, or exercise of the power of eminent domain. If the governing body of the municipality or county that created the recreation district for exclusive use by a condominium established under chapter 718 or a cooperative established under chapter 719 makes the finding described in s. 418.24(4), the governing body of the district may make the recreational facilities available exclusively for district resid ents and property owners, and may restrict any access to recreational facilities by nonresidents by rules adopted by the governing body of the district.

Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Formatted: Font: 9 pt

Prior to any vote of the electors in the district adopting or amending a charter pursuant to
s. 418.20 , the governing body shall decide whether the criteria in s. 418.24(4) apply and whether the recreation district shall be available exclusively for the district residents . The recreation district may construct and maintain security buildings and other structures needed to regulate access to, and provide security for, the recreational facilities.
To issue bonds, secured by ad valorem taxes or by pledge of both such taxes and other revenues of the district, if approved at a referendum held in such district, and to levy and collect ad valorem taxes, without limitation or with such limitation as may be imposed by charter, on all real property subject to city taxation within such district in order to pay the principal of and interest on such bonds as the same respectively fall due or to accumulate a sinking fund for the payment of principal and interest. The referendum required by this section may be held on the same day as any other related to the district; provided that such bonds shall bear interest at a rate pursuant to s. 215 .81 aAEI be sole at flllblic sale. IA the eveAt aA offer ofaA iss!le ofboAEls at p1:1blic sale proE11:1ees  AO biEI,  or iA  the eveAt all bias receives are rajeeteEI, .   t.Ih   e  district is authorized to sell the bonds at public sale or to negotiate for the sale of such bonds under such rates and terms as compIv \\ ith ,1;itc la\\ are acceptable; provided that no such bonds shall be sold or delivered on terms less favorable than the terms contained in any bids rejected at the public sale thereof or the terms contained in the notice of public sale if no bids were received at such public sale.
To operate and maintain recreational facilities or to enter into arrangements with others for such operation and maintenance pursuant to contract, lease, or otherwise.
To establish, charge , and collect fees for admission to or use of recreational facilities and to apply such fees to the operation, maintenance, im provement, en largement, or acquisition of recreational facilities or to the payment of bonds or revenue bonds of the district.
To issue revenue bonds payable solely from the reven ues to be derived from recreational facilities owned or operated by such district if approved at a referendum held in such district; provided that such bonds shall bear interest at a rate pursuant to s. 215.84 and be sold at public sale. ln the event an offer of an issue of bonds at public sale produces no bid, or in the event all bids received are rejected, the district is authorized to negotiate for the sale of such bonds under such rates and terms as are acceptable; provided that no such bonds shall be so sold or delivered on terms less favorable than the terms contained in any bids rejected at the public sale thereof or the terms contained in the notice of public sale ifno bids were received at such public sale.
To adopt and enforce rules for the use of the recreational facilities owned or operated by the district.
To employ all personnel deemed necessary for the operation and maintenance of the
facilities of the district.

Formatted : Font 9 pt
Formatted : Font 9 pt

AMEJ,ID SECTIO\ -418.	to read as folilms:

418.    Electronic voting.-

The district may conduct elections and other membership votes through an Internet-based online voting system ifa member consents, in writing, to online voting and if the following requirements are met:
The district provides each member with:
A method to authenticate the member 's identity to the online voting system.
A method to confirm, at least 14 days before the voting deadline, that the member 's electronic device can successfully communicate with the onlin e voting system.
A method that is consistent with the elec tion and voting procedures in the district's bylaws.
The district uses an online voting system that is:
Able to authenticate the memb er's identity.
Able to authenticate the validity of each electronic vote to ensure that the vote is not altered in transit.
Able to transmit a receipt from the online voting system to each member who casts an electronic vote.
Able to permanently separate any authentication or identifying information from the electronic election ballot, rendering it impossible to tie an election ballot to a specific member. This paragraph only applies if the district's bylaws provide for secret ballots for the election of directors.
Able to store and keep electronic ballots accessible to election officials for recount, inspection, and review purposes.
A member voting ele ctronically pursuant to this section shall be counted as being in attendance at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.
This section applies to an district that provides for and authorizes an online voting system pursuant to this section by a board resolution . The board resolution must provide that members receive notice of the opportunity to vote through an online voting system, must establish reasonab le procedures and deadlines for members to consent, in writing, to online voting, and must establish reasonable procedures and deadlines for members to opt out of online voting after giving consent. Written notice ofa meeting at which the board resolution regarding online voting will be considered must be mailed. delivered, or electronically transmitted to the unit owners and posted conspicuously on the district property at least 14 days before the meeting. Evidence of compliance with the 14-day notice requirement must be made by an affidavit executed by the
person providing the notice and filed with the official records of the district.

Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Formatted: Font: 9 pt

A member ' s consent to online voting is valid until the member opts out of online voting pursuant to the procedures established by the board of administration pursuant to subsection (4).
This section may apply to any matter that requires a vote of the members .

Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Format ted: Font: 9 pt

University Park Recreation District

Consideration of Amendment to the Water Agreement with UPCAI

University Park Recreation District

Monthly Board of Supervisors Reports

University Park Recreation District

Review & Acceptance of FY 2020 Audit Report

University Park Recreation District

Staff Reports

University Park Recreation District Management Discussion & Analysis Report As of May 31, 2021

Overview
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our lives and our business in ways we never imagined 15 months ago. At long last, and in alignment with new CDC and OSHA guidelines, the mandatory mask requirements for fully vaccinated members, residents, and guests was lifted on May 24th. These individuals are no longer required to wear masks in any space INDOOR or OUTDOOR at the Club.
Non-fully vaccinated members, residents and guests are required to wear a mask in INDOOR spaces at all times and in OUTDOOR spaces when social distancing cannot be maintained. Although the honor system is being used, we ask that all members, residents, and guests continue to respect the health and well-being of your fellow members, neighbors, and staff.
Mask requirements for staff members will be evolving in the coming weeks as more and more team members become vaccinated. Currently, all staff members regardless of vaccination status are wearing masks when in INDOOR public facing spaces. Non-fully vaccinated employees are required to wear a mask at all times. Fully vaccinated staff working in non-public facing spaces are not required to wear masks. Unlike members, residents and guests, employees are required to show proof of vaccination before forgoing use of a mask.
During the May 14th University Park Recreation District (UPRD) Board of Supervisors meeting the Board approved the preliminary FY2022 Enterprise Fund (Country Club), General Fund and Debt Services budgets. The Board also set the Public Hearing date to adopt the respective final budgets at the August 13, 2021 UPRD Board Meeting.
The Request for Proposal (RFP) process for the design of the indoor and outdoor dining spaces closed on Friday, May 28th. Management and volunteer advisors are actively reviewing the proposals received which will be presented at the June 9th UPRD Board Workshop. It is expected the Board will approve a professional firm at the June 11th UPRD Board Meeting at which point the process will commence.
As previously reported, Park Boulevard Management (PBM), in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, applied for and was granted a Payroll Protection Plan loan (“the Loan”) through the Small Business Administration (SBA). The amount of the Loan was $855,783. The Loan only impacted the PBM management and staff that served Club operations, managed for the Club by PBM. The funds were advanced to the Club to cover approximately 2.5 months of payroll expenses. We are happy to report notification from the SBA was received on April 28, 2021 that the Loan had been forgiven and effective May 20, 2021, UPCAI approved taking action to make the appropriate entries needed to permit the use of such funds by the Club.
Golf Course Maintenance
On the Golf Course, the first round of annual summer cultural practices including greens aerification, circle mowing and verticutting on holes #1- #9 and #19-#27 was completed in May

University Park Recreation District Management Discussion & Analysis Report As of May 31, 2021

prior to the closure of the mid-nine for the approved renovation project. Additionally, we will be completing much needed maintenance to our driving range including aerifying, fertilizing and topdressing. Each of these maintenance processes are necessary to maintain the health of the turf and continue to drive the highest standards in playability, a cornerstone of our Golf Experience.
The approved greenside bunker and tee box renovation project on holes #10-18 began Tuesday, June 1st. The project will take approximately 8 – 10 weeks during which time those holes will be CLOSED. The project includes leveling and expanding select tee boxes, renovating greenside bunkers, expansive cart path repairs and the addition of new plant beds and trees. While closed we will also be aerifying greens & fairways and rough. This is similar to the work done on holes #1-9 last summer.

Human Resources and Staffing
Please join us in welcoming Steve Barnett to the PBM management team as our new Community Association Manager. Steve comes to us with more than 30 years in community association management, most recently from an upscale gated community in Westlake, Texas. Prior to that, Steve spent many years in Sarasota managing large resort and condominium complexes on Siesta Key. Be sure to stop by the PBM office in The Varsity Club to introduce yourself.
Food and Beverage
Due to the overwhelming feedback we received and the popularity of our á la carte Sunday Breakfast menu, developed during COVID-19, we have adjusted our proposed Sunday Mimosa Brunch schedule. During the summer months only, we will be offering our traditional Sunday Brunch buffet ONE Sunday per month (May 23rd, June 20th [Father’s Day], July 18th and August 22nd). For the remainder of the Sunday food service periods this summer we will offer our popular á la carte Sunday Breakfast.
We continued to see well attended and extremely successful member events all month-long including Cinco de Mayo Night, Mother’s Day Brunch, Italian Night, and our popular Prime Rib, Bingo & Trivia Nights! Attendance at our Memorial Day events was at record-breaking levels with more than 190 members enjoying the holiday festivities. The increased numbers are in part due to the expanded seating capacity added during COVID-19 in the courtyard as well as our member’s desire to eat outside in general.
Non-member banquet and wedding business is back. Not only are more and more events being booked into next year, but we are also seeing an increase in short term bookings. The upcoming renovation at The Park Grille poses a challenge when booking events for the next 6 – 9 months but potential customers are excited to hear more about the improvements.

University Park Recreation District Management Discussion & Analysis Report As of May 31, 2021

Golf
The Golf Course continues to produce unprecedented numbers of member and outside rounds and exceeds budget and all prior years used as comparison in total revenue. May is historically a busy month with the start of Summer Reciprocals and Big Summer Card players and this year was no exception. Great weather also helped to drive these exceptional results. Total rounds exceeded budget by almost 2,000 rounds in May, with member rounds outpacing budget by 1,310.
While management is cautiously optimistic the course will maintain high levels of play during the summer months, we continue to monitor the impact the mid-9 renovation and the high number of summer golf members will have on outside play opportunities and thereby outside play revenue.

Membership
The Summer membership season for Golf and Tennis members is off and running! Despite the price increases, Summer Golf memberships have proven to be one of the most successful in UPCC history! (UPDATE: actual sales through June 3rd are 218.)

Full	
Tennis	
Sports	
Social	Soc /
Res - Cmty Reqrd	Tw iligh t Tennis	
Jr. Exec.	Change
in Annual Mbrs	
Trial Full	
Trial Ten/Fit	Trial Fit/So c	
Trial Social	
Sum Golf	
Sum Tennis	
Sum Dining	Change
in Other Mbrs	
Required Community Memberships	
2020 Totals		291	106	79	208	459	8	3	1154	7	7	3	4	0	0	0	21	823		
Jan 2021		4	-1	-3	-1	6	1		6	14	1	2	2				19	8	7 Soc/Res, 1 Tennis	
Feb 2021		4	2	-1	-5	-1	2		1	6	-3	1	-1				3	9	7 Soc/Res, 1 Full,
1 Tw i Ten	
Mar 2021		3	-1	1	-2	2			3	-12	-3	0	-3	156	9	X	147	10	7 Soc/Res, 2 Full, 1
Sports	
Apr 2021		-2	-1		-2	10			5	-13	-1	-4	-1	29	1		11	12	11 Soc/Res, 1 Full	
SMR	5/5								0					8			8			
SMR	5/11								0					8			8			
	5/14		1			4			5		-1	-1					-2	5	4 Soc/Res, 1 Tennis	
	5/18				1	1			2								0	1	1 Soc/Res	
SMR	5/18								0					7			7			
SMR	5/25								0					3	1		4			
	5/27				-2	2			0	-2		-1					-3	3	3 Soc/Res	
NEW - SMR	5/28								0					3			3			
Total Members	300	106	76	197	483	11	3	1176	0	0	0	1	214	11	0	226	871		

Past Summer Counts Summer Conversions

University Park Recreation District Management Discussion & Analysis Report As of May 31, 2021

Golf	T&F	Dining	Year		
136	25	45	2013		
121	22	25	2014		
192	26	42	2015		
108	26	35	2016		
76	15	24	2017	4 Full, 3 Tennis, 2 Sports, 2 Social	
175	17	36	2018	9 Full, 4 Tennis, 1 Sports, 6 Social	
235	25	40	2019	19 Full, 7 Tennis, 4 Sports, 11 Social	
152	54	5	2020	15 Full, 18 Tennis, 2 Sports, 3 Social	
214	11	XX	2021		

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

									

University Park Recreation District Management Discussion & Analysis Report As of May 31, 2021

$524k increase over Budget due to 7,691 more rounds than budgeted, including 3,921 outside rounds, and pricing.
Continued impact of COVID-19, particularly no Banquet events. Higher COGS is due to “To Go” Service costs vs. traditional indoor dining and fewer dining events with higher margins (e.g., special events and Sunday brunch).
Increase primarily due to Legal and Professional services including legal expenses related to a 401(k) Plan matter, Trademarks, and Strategic Planning Consulting.
Actual legal expense of $34k is for General Representation.
FY2021 YTD expenses include unique/unbudgeted expenses for the Board Election ($13k), Annual Trustee Fee ($7k) and Accounting ($6k) which will smooth out variance to Budget over the balance of the FY.

Revenue Flash Report (as of May 31, 2021):

	May		YTD		
	Actual	Budget	Variance		Actual	Budget	Variance		
									
MEMBERSHIP DUES	$   295,014	$ 292,190	$	2,824		$ 2,375,852	$ 2,349,550	$ 26,302	(a)	
GOLF OPERATIONS	289,364	196,749	92,615		2,656,111	2,039,818	616,293	(b)	
TENNIS & FITNESS CENTRE	7,315	5,935	1,380		49,373	49,517	(144)		
RESTAURANT OPERATIONS	195,140	133,624	61,516		1,299,873	1,344,184	(44,311)	(c)	
									
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE:	$   786,833	$ 628,498	$ 158,335		$ 6,381,209	$ 5,783,069	$ 598,140		
									
INITIATION FEES & OTHER INC	8,142	4,125	4,017		248,541	152,400	96,141	(a)	
OPERATIONS RECOVERY SURCHARGE	38,473	40,205	(1,732)		191,243	199,890	(8,647)		
									
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE:	$	46,615	$ 44,330	$	2,285		$   439,784	$   352,290	$ 87,494		
									
TOTAL REVENUE:	$   833,448	$ 672,828	$ 160,620		$ 6,820,993	$ 6,135,359	$ 685,634		
Reflects new membership sales for the eight months ending May 2021. Membership dues continue to exceed budget due to strong summer membership sales. New memberships (the basis for Initiation Fees) continue to exceed Budget.
$616k over Budget YTD due to pricing and substantially more rounds, as outlined below:
Rounds of Golf:

Member Rounds	4,630	3,320	1,310		30,460	26,690	3,770	
Outside Rounds	4,072	3,420	652		26,666	22,745	3,921	
	8,702	6,740	1,962		57,126	49,435	7,691	

Reflects continued impact of COVID-19 on restaurant sales, notably banquet events, as well as the deferral of the F&B minimum spend to December 2021 (generally recorded as revenue in December of the prior year).

University Park Recreation District

Ratification of Payment Authorizations # 49-50

5/7/2021

University Park Recreation District

Payment Authorization No. 49

O&M - General Fund Expenses

Vendor	Invoice	Description	Amount	
Blalock Walters	40896-014-17	V. Rodger B. Dowdell, JR. & Linda A. Dowdell	$	1,102.00	
Blalock Walters	40896-000-30	General Representation -April 2021	$	5,564.72	
PFM	DM-04-2021-0048	District Management Fee: April 2021	$	5,833.33	
PFM	114720	Billable Expenses	$	145.41	
McClatchy Company, LLC	19048	Notice of Public Meeting - April	$	339.30	

O&M - General Fund Expenses Total	$	12,984.76

Asst. Secretary/Secretary

BLALOCK WALTERS
ATTORNEYS  AT LAW

WEMAKE  A DIFF E R E N C E

P.O. Box 469 Bradenton, Florida 34206-0469 ph: 941.748.0100 fx: 941.745.2093

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LLC
12051 CORPORATE BLVD
ORLANDO, FL 32817

Page	1
April 30, 2021
Account#	40896-014
Invoice#	40896-014-17

ATTN:	ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@UNIVERSITYPARK-FL.COM

V. RODGER B. DOWDELL, JR. & LINDA A. DOWDELL

REMITTANCE COPY

BALANCE

40896-014

MPB	$1,102.00

If you prefer to receive paperless invoices by email, please complete the information below or email mforbes@blalockwalters.com.

 	  Yes, I would prefer paperless billing by email.

Email Address for paperless billing purposes:

Please Return the Remittance Copy with Your Payment
Make Check Payable to Blalock Walters, P.A.
Federal Tax ID# 59-1950976

BLALOCK WALTERS
ATTORNEYS  AT LAW

WEMAKE A DIFFERENCE
P.O. Box 469• Bradenton, Florida 34206-0469 ph: 941.748.0100 fx: 941.745.2093

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LLC
12051 CORPORATE BLVD
ORLANDO, FL  32817

Page	1
April 30, 2021
Account# 40896-014
Invoice#	40896-014-17

ATTN:	ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@UNIVERSITYPARK-FL.COM

MPB	V. RODGER B. DOWDELL, JR. & LINDA A. DOWDELL			
	
For Professional Services Rendered Thru 04/30/2021			
		HOURS		
04/01/2021	MJP		Various communications with John Fetsick regarding deposit of judgment payment.	
0.40	
90.00	
	MJP	Various communications with John Fetsick relating to attorneys fees.	0.40	90.00	
04/05/2021	MJP		Various communications with Linda Dowdell regarding deposit of settlement payment.	
0.40	
90.00	
04/09/2021	MJP	Prepare correspondence to John Fetsick confirming funds have cleared so I			
	can move forward with satisfaction of lien and judgment.	0.20	45.00	
04/14/2021	MJP	Prepare follow up correspondence to John Fetsick regarding clearance of judgment funds.	
0.20	
45.00	
	MJP	Prepare release and satisfaction of lien; prepare satisfaction of judgment. release of lis pendens, and notice of voluntary dismissal.	
1.50	
337.50	
04/15/2021	MJP	Various communications with Vivian Carvalho regarding satisfaction of lien.	0.40	90.00	
04/19/2021	MJP	Review of executed release of lien; Finalize dismissal documents; prepare correspondence to Mrs. Dowdell regarding the same.	
0.50	
112.50	
	MJP	Draft Notice of filing corrected dismissal.	0.30	67.50	
04/20/2021	MJP		Prepare correspondence to Mrs. Dowdell forwarding recorded copy of satisfaction of lien.	
0.20	
45.00	
	TOTAL FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES	4.50	1,012.50	
04/21/2021	BLALOCK WALTERS, P.A. TRUST ACCOUNT FOR RECORDING		14.50	
04/28/2021	IMPERIAL COURT REPORTING INV#205915		75.00	
	TOTAL EXPENSES		89.50	

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT
V. RODGER B. DOWDELL, JR. & LINDA A. DOWDELL MPB

Page	2
April 30, 2021
Account# 40896-014
Invoice#	40896-014-17

TOTAL CURRENT WORK PREVIOUS BALANCE

1,102.00

$1,177.50

PAYMENTS RECEIVED

04/19/2021	Payment received on account.  Thank you!	-1,177.50

AMOUNT DUE (includes Previous Balance if shown above)	$1,102.00

If you prefer to receive paperless invoices by email, please complete the information below or email mforbes@blalockwalters.com.

 	  Yes, I would prefer paperless billing by email.

Email Address for paperless billing purposes:

Please Return the Remittance Copy with Your Payment
Make Check Payable to Blalock Walters, P.A.
Federal Tax ID# 59-1950976

BLALOCK WALTERS
ATTORNEYS  AT LAW

WEMAKE A DIFFERENCE

P.O. Box 469 Bradenton, Florida 34206-0469 ph: 941.748.0100 fx: 941.745.2093

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LLC
12051 CORPORATE BLVD
ORLANDO, FL 32817

Page	1
April 30, 2021
Account #	40896-000
Invoice #	40896-000-30

ATTN:	ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@UNIVERSITYPARK-FL.COM GENERAL REPRESENTATION

REMITTANCE COPY

BALANCE

40896-000

MPB	$5,564.72

If you prefer to receive paperless invoices by email, please complete the information below or email mforbes@blalockwalters.com.

 	  Yes, I would prefer paperless billing by email.

Email Address for paperless billing purposes:

Please Return the Remittance Copy with Your Payment
Make Check Payable to Blalock Walters, P.A.
Federal Tax ID# 59-1950976

m

m

BLALOCK WALTERS
A T T O R N E Y S    AT	L A W

WE  MAKE A DIFFERENCE
P.O. Box 469• Bradenton, Florida 34206-0469 ph: 941.748.0100 fx: 941.745.2093

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT PFM FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LLC
12051 CORPORATE BLVD
ORLANDO, FL 32817

Page	1
April 30, 2021
Account# 40896-000
Invoice #	40896-000-30

ATIN:	ACCOUNTSPAYABLE@UNIVERSITYPARK-FL.COM

MPB	GENERAL REPRESENTATION		
	
For Professional Services Rendered Thru 04/30/2021		

04/01/2021	
MJP	Attend Town Hall/Workshop on Master Plan.	HOURS
3.20	
640.00	
04/02/2021	MPB	Work in file on Resolutions for Board Meeting.	0.40	94.00	
	JA	Prepare resolutions regarding Master Plan and Amended rules.	0.70	70.00	
04/04/2021	MPB Work on Resolution; preparation of Memorandum to Laurie Evans.	0.60	141.00	
04/05/2021	MPB Review and respond to Memorandum from John Fetsick.	0.20	47.00	
04/06/2021	MPB Telephone conference with Jim Case; review the Resolution; telephone conference with Jim Case.	
0.80	
188.00	
04/07/2021	MPB Preparation of Resolution terminating COVID restrictions; telephone conference with Laurie Evans; preparation of Memorandum to John Scott;			
	review and respond to Memorandum from John Scott.	1.40	329.00	
04/08/2021	MPB Telephone conference with Chair, Laurie Evans and John Fetsick regarding			
	agenda meetings; telephone conference with Vivian Carvalho and Venessa Ripoli related to the agenda.	
0.80	
188.00	
04/09/2021	MJP	Review communication from Paul Fay regarding November payment; research to determine to which matter payment related.	
0.40	
80.00	
	MJP	Review follow up information provided by Paul Fay; review information and			
	determine applicable matter; prepare correspondence to Paul Fay regarding the same.		
80.00	
	MPB Preparation for and attendance at the Board meeting; review and respond to			
	Memorandum from Bill DiPaolo	4.60	1,081.00	
04/11/2021	MPB Review Rules of Procedure; preparation of Memorandum to Steve Ludmerer on Board action.	
0.60	
141.00	

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT GENERAL REPRESENTATION
MPB

Page	2
April 30, 2021
Account# 40896-000
Invoice #	40896-000-30

	HOURS		
04/12/2021	MPB	Review and respond to Memorandum from Steve Ludmerer; telephone			
		conference with Chair.	0.50	117.50	
	JA	Review email from Telese McKay. Review draft agreement.	0.70	70.00	
04/13/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Chair; preparation of Memorandum to the Chair.	0.40	94.00	
04/14/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Chair; preparation of letter to University Park			
		Community Association for Chair; telephone conference with Chair.	0.90	211.50	
04/15/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Jim Case; preparation of Memorandum to Jim		
		Case .	0.40	94.00	
04/18/2021	MPB	Review and respond to public records request from Gary Chase; review and		
		respond to Memorandum from John Whyte.	0.40	94.00	
04/19/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Steve Ludmerer; telephone conferences (2) with			
		Jim Case.	0.70	164.50	
04/20/2021	MPB	Review and respond to Chair's Memorandum; preparation for and attendance			
		at the continued public meeting; work on Resolution.	4.10	963.50	
04/21/2021	MPB	Review and respond to Memorandum from Karen Pagano; review and			
		respond to Memorandum from Vivian Carvalho; review and respond to			
		Memorandum from Jim Case.	0.50	117.50	
04/23/2021	MPB	Work on Charter matters.	0.40	94.00	
04/24/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Jim Case.	0.30	70.50	
04/26/2021	MJP	Review research regarding delegation of rights.	2.10	420.00	
04/27/2021	MPB	Telephone conference with Jim Case; review issues on Agreement.	0.20	47.00	
04/29/2021	MJP	Further research regarding delegation of authority from District to association.	0.60	120.00	
	MPB	Telephone conference with agenda preparation for upcoming work; telephone			
		conference with Chair.	1.40	329.00	
		TOTAL FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES	27.70	6,086.00	
		COURTESY DISCOUNT		-608.60	
		Net Fees after Courtesy Discount		5,477.40	
04/12/2021		Online Legal Research MPB		2.32	
04/26/2021		Online Legal Research MJP		85.00	
		TOTAL EXPENSES		87.32	
		TOTAL CURRENT WORK		5,564.72	

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT GENERAL REPRESENTATION
MPB

Page	3
April 30, 2021
Account # 40896-000
Invoice#	40896-000-30

PREVIOUS BALANCE	$6,569.55

PAYMENTS RECEIVED

04/19/2021	Payment received on account.  Thank you!	-6,569.55

AMOUNT DUE (includes Previous Balance if shown above)	$5,564.72

If you prefer to receive paperless invoices by email, please complete the information below or email mforbes@blalockwalters.com.

 	  Yes, I would prefer paperless billing by email.

Email Address for paperless billing purposes:

Please Return the Remittance Copy with Your Payment Make Check Payable to Blalock Walters, P.A.
Federal Tax ID# 59-1950976

Bill To;

University Park Recreation District
c/o PFM Group Consulting District Accounting Department
12051 Corporate Blvd
Orlando, FL 32817 United States of Americ a

Remittance Options:
I,
PFM Group Consulting LLC PO Box 65126
Baltimore, MO 21264-5126 United States of America

pfm

1735 Market Street 43rd   Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-6100

.Compa11y Address:

RE:	District Management Fee: April 2021

Professional Fees
Total Amount Due

$5,833.J3
$5,833.33

0ate	Invoice Number	
April 7, 2021	DM-04-2021-0048	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	April 7, 2021	

of

Date	Invoice Number	
April 13, 2021	114720	
Payment Terms	DueO te	
Upon Receipt	April 13, 2021	

8i11 To:

University Park Recreation District
c/o PFM Group Consulting District Accounting Department
12051 Corporate Blvd
Orlando, FL 32817 United Stales of America

Remittance Options:
JLla.!.Mal1:..
PFM Group Consulting LLC
PO Box 65126
Baltimore, MO 21264-5126 United States of America

RE:	Billable expenses. Expenses
Total Amount Due

pfm

1735 Markel Street 43rd   Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-6100

.CompanyAddre:ss:

$145.41
tliM1

Date	Invoice N,umber	
April 13, 2021	114720	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	April 13, 2021	

pfm

Expense Supporting Detail

€ateoorv

Worker

Amounl Billed

Gas (Rental Car)	Vivian Carvalho	03/12/21

Gas (Rental Car) .

$46.20

Meals	Vivian Carvalho	03112121	$9.31
Meals S9.a1	
Parking	Vivian Carvalho	03/12/21	$12.00	
			Parking i12&Q	
Rental Gar	Vivian Carvalho	03112121	$60.85
Rental Car S6o.a5.	
Tolls	Vivian Carvalho	02112/21	$17.05	
			Tolls	
			Total Expenses: $145.41	

oll Statement

Print

Your Information	Your Card Information

Customer Name: VIVIAN CARVALHO

Address: 233 WISHING WELL CIRCLE SW, PALM BAY FL32908

Your Payment Information

Statement ID: EHlll20ll640

Total Toll Amount: $27.S0
Service Charge :  $7.90/z, :;:- j/. 3,	't S
$3.95 per toll usage day, max $19.75 per rental

Total Charges: $35.40 Amount Paid : $35.40 Balance Due : $0.00

	T(J11 teTime	
Toll Authority/Toll Road	
Entry Plaza	
E)l.it Plaza	
V hicte Class	
Toll r:ee		
	2/r2/20218:16.-00 PM	Florida Oep.lrtment of Transportation	-	SR91 KISSIMM EE PARK RD MP2• 0	2	$1.75		
	2/l>/2O218:01:20 PM	SR-4T7		JVOUNG•M	2	$2,90		
	2/12/20217:SS:49 PM	Florida Depart nl ofTransportiltion	..
-	SR4\7 CELEBRATION MAINLINE MP)	2	Sl.25		
	2/r2/2l>2110:20;32 AM	Florida Departtnent of Tlansportation	-	SR:$28 Bch1if\e We=.t Main WBM P6	2	$3.55		
	'dYl/20111001:Y'> AM	-528		BCHLINE-M	2	Sl.a,.		
	2/12/202110:04.10AM	SR-528	.-.	OALlAS ·M	2	$1.81		
	2/10/2021S:0825 PM	SR·528	-	D ALLAS·M	2	$1.81		
	2/IO/lOO.l ,;;5826 PM	SR-528	..	BCHUNE-M	2	$1.84		
	2/10/2021 4: 9:2'i PM	Flo,ida Department of Tran.porcation		SftSla act-.t\ne 'W \.Mai1' ES MPi>	2	,;.;.s,;		
	2/lo/20211005:30 AM	Ronda Department of lta"'l)Ortatlon	-	SllSZB B<:hllru>Wfft Mal/I W8MP6	2	$3.55		
	2/10/.202110:07 3 AM	s -s,a	-	BCH LINE·M	2	$184		
	2/10/202110:00:26 AM	SR-528	-	DALLAS·M	2	$1,81		

Tolling Summary

l

CC Type:  MASTER CARD

Your Rental Information

Contract/Rental Agreement Number:  848474590

Pick up Date and Time :  2/10/2021 9:12:00 AM (
MELBOURNE. FL)

Return Date and Time: 2/13/2021 8:54 :00 AM
(MELBOURNE, FL)

..
""
"I<'

Please note that there may be a delay on tolls being posted to your receipt due to a delay of the Transportation Agencies consolidating and posting tolls in a timely manner. In the event additional tolls are forwarded to us, we will process them and forward an addit ional e-receipt to you as soon as o assilJ/e.
It you   have any questions regarding toll activity that islisted on the receipt please contact us at8 77 -860 -1258 or to llp asscustom ercare {ci)htallc.com .

/6os	d-/ 1	202. 1
If 3, qs	-1-1/ 13	)0 ::;;.

·75	/ / s
#	11 -- 05

3/19/2021	Mail - Vivian Carvalho - Outlook

ENTERPRISE RENTAL AGREEMENT 2QBK22
Customerservice@enterprise.com <Customerservice@enterprise.com >
Sat 3/13/2021 10:22 AM
To: vcarvalh8@hotrnail.com <vcarvalh8@hotmail.com>

ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF ORLANDO, 920 HARBOR CITY BLVD, MELBOURNE, FL 329011486 {321) 676-2426

RENTAL AGREEMENT	REF#	
768166	2 BK22

RENTER	

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

CARVALHO 1 VIVIAN	 	 Charge Description	Date	Quantity	Per
TIME & DISTANCE	03/ 10 - 03/ 13	3	DAY

Rate	Total
$54.00	$162.00

-- - - -

DATE & TIME OUT	
03i:'10l'.2021 08 :00 AM	

Taxes & Surcharges

Subtotal:

$162.00

DATE  &. TIME IN	FL WASTE TIRE & BATTERY FEE   03/10 - 03/13	3	DAY 03l13/2021 08:00 AM	SALES TAX	03/10 - 03/13
 	 SC REC - FL SURCHG RECOV	03/10 - 03/13	3	DAY
BILLING CYCLE	VEHICLE LICENSE FEE	03/10 - 03/13	3	DAY
24-HOUR	RECOVERY

$0.02	$0.06
7%	$11.94
$2.00	$6.00
$0.85	$2.55

VEH #1 2021 CHEV SUBl lLTl
VIN# 1GNSCCKD2MR263066	
UC#  MST72	

Total Amount Due PAYMENT INFORMATION

Total Charges:

$182,55

$0.00

MILES DRIVEN 167	

AMOUNT PAID	TYPE

CREDIT CARD NUMBER

 	   $182.55	Mastercard
RATE SOURCE ACCOUNT	
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

U-f	.D	
( 1)	7)i' -/-rl'ci

II Ii . ss/ 3 W-Lfs

xxxxxxxxxxxx8330 PENDING

h  ttp  s://outlook.live.com/mailO/ /inbo  x/id/AQMkADAwATE2MTcwLWEwYzYtzjc3AGEtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADTEpESWyqrE2nvetvVQTl4wcAm9DAFLY...	111

Receipt
146208031220002021

Helbourne fllrPort
Tll11nk you
for Parking uith
RepubliG Parkina

FeeCo•puter Hu1ber: o
:ntry !1118: 3/10/2021 B:10 AM
Dxtt f1l\e: 3/12/2021 6:00 PM
uratfon: 2d llh 50r;,
Up; Uonald
llon-res11t11bla tr II: 2210 2
Tran: 1462	•
Ticket lhlaber: !'il757

lonll Ter11 Hew

Tot11l: H11SterCard Last 4 Dt!lits:

S	36.00

s	36.00
$	36.00
8330

Please coae 898\n

Uf	o	fcuL i
l 1 /	Dls +ri c.-,,f-

3/12/282121:47:5
Order Number:
Circle K 2726513 908 Malabar Ad SW Palm Bay FL 32907
(321) 987-0887
Term: 102
Appr: 01207R
UNL-REG

PUMP No.
Gallons PRICE/G TOTAL FUEL TOTAL SALE SALE
Discover
Card Num : (S)

14
16.331
$2.829
$46.213
$46.20

XXXXXXXXXXXX4809

03/12/2021 21:44:18

(bas) f_m-{tJ
Uf	t<.'i)
(1) Dis-fn'c.,-/-
dt q.0 .·w

I agree to pay the above Total Amount according to Card Issuer Agreement.
THANK YOU
HAVE A NICE DAY

CHK 718007
03/12/2021 12:08 PM
XXX4179 Drawer: 2 Reg: 1
Order
Vt Ic Passn Tea	3.25
Cheese & Fruit Box	5.45	
	Subtotal Tax 77'
Total	$8.70
$0.61
$9.31	
	Change Due	$0.00	
(f}uls 3}12-/2-l
urtD
(•)T)Jsfdcd
4f	q ._:)  ,.	Payments
Mastercard	9.31
Card Entry: Chip
App Label:Mastercarct AID:A0000000041010 TSI:EBOO
---------- Check Closed---------------
03/12/2021 12:08 PM

Join our loyalty program Starbucks Rewards®
Sign up for promotional emails Visit Starbucks.com/rewards Or dOY1nload our app
At participating stores Some restrictions apply	

STARBUCKS Store #8562
5485 University Pkwy
University Park, FL (941) 351-1509

XXXXXXXXXXXX8330
Trans Type: SALE Auth:01216Z TVR:0000008000

Page 1of 1

UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT
Attn: Accounts Payable 7671 THE PARK BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK BRADENTON, FL 34201

INVOICE	
Invoice No.:	19048	
Invoice Date:	04/30/2021	
DueDate:	05/30/2021	
BIii-To Accolllt:	29585	
Sales Rep:	Ryan Dixon	

Diles	1	k	1	
Desa"6on	
Procklct	
Sile	1 1::I	
NetAmolllt	
04/02/2021- 04/02/2021	31111	Print Legal Ad IPL0015926	BRD-BradentonHerald - Legal I Legals & Public Notices CLS	ZxS.61 in	$133.38	
04/23/2021- 04/23/2021	51871	Print Legal Ad IPL0020569	BRD-Bradenton Herald - Legal ILegals & Public Notices CLS	1x5.71 in	$67.86	
04/27/20'1.1 - 04/27/2021	53432	PrintLegal Ad IPL0019701	BRD-BradentonHerald -LegalI Legals & Public Notices
CLS	2 x S.81in	$138.06	

IAmount Due:

Summary
I

$339.301

McClatchy Company LLC PO Box 510150
Livonia Ml 48151

INVOICE	
Invoice No.:	19048	
Account No.:	29585	
ccount Name:	UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT	
Amount Due:	$339.30	

Please Return This Portion Wit h Your Payment (Thank You)

ADVERTISING INVOICE
UNIVERSITY PARK RECREATION DISTRICT
Attn: Accounts Payable 7671 THE PARK BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK BRADENTON, FL 34201

0000029585 0000019048 000033930 5

Email questions to ssccreditandcollections@mcclatchy.com

McClatchy Company LLC PO Box 510150
Livonia Ml 48151

5/20/2021

University Park Recreation District

Payment Authorization No. 50

O&M - General Fund Expenses

Asst. Treas	

Vendor	Invoice	Description	Amount	
PFM	DM-05-2021-0048	District Management Fee: May 2021	$	5,833.33	
PFM	OE-EXP-05-51	April 2021 Postage/Fedex	$	17.99	
PFM	115016	Billable Expenses	$	1,353.74	
Philips Harvey Group	13477	Audit FY 2020/FFE Accounting	$	3,025.00	
Vglobal Tech	2694	ADA Website Maintenance	$	208.33	

O&M - General Fund Expenses Total	$	10,438.39

Asst. Secretary/Secretary

6JIITo:

University Park Recreation District
c/o PFM Group Consulting District Accounting Department
12051 Corporate Blvd
Orlando, FL 32817 United States of America

Remittance Options:

PFM Group Consulting LLC PO Box 65126
Baltimore, MD 21264-5126 United States of Am erica

pfm

1735 Market Street 43rd   Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-6100

Company Address :

RE:	District Management Fee: May 2021

Date	Invoice Number	
May 5, 2021	DM-05-2021-0048	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	May 5, 2021	

Professional Fees
Total Amount Due

$5,833.33
$5,833.33

Bill To:

University Park Recreation District
c/o PFM Group Consulting District Accounting Department
12051 Corporate Blvd
Orlando, FL 32817 United States of America

Remittance Options:
.\li.a..Mail;_
PFM Group Consulting LLC PO Box 65126
Baltimore, MD 21264-5126 United States of America

pfm

1735 Market Street 43rd   Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-6100

Company Address:

RE:	April 2021 Postage $.51 and Fedex $17.48

Date	Invoice Number	
May 12, 2021	OE-EXP-05-51	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	May 12, 2021	

Expenses
Total Amount Due

$17.99
$17.99

Date	Invoice Number	
May 6, 2021	115016	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	May 6, 2021	

Bill To:

University Park Recreation District
c/o PFM Group Consulting District Accounting Department
12051 Corporate Blvd
Orlando, FL 32817 United States of America

Remittance Options:
'ii.a..Mait..
PFM Group Consulting LLC
PO Box 65126
Baltimore, MD 21264-5126 United States of America
RE:	Billable expenses. Expenses
Total Amount Due

pfm

1735 Market Street 43rd   Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-6100

Company Address:

$1,353.74
$1,353.74

Date	Invoice Number	
May 6, 2021	115016	
Payment Terms	Due Date	
Upon Receipt	May 6, 2021	

pfm

Cateoorv

Worker

Expense Supporting Detail
Transaction Date

Amount Billed

Software Subscriptions

Jennifer Walden	03/27/21

Software Subscriptions

$900.00

Meals	Vivian Carvalho	04/09/21	$10.76	
Meals	Vivian Carvalho	04/20/21	$10.06	
Meals

Mileage Reimbursement	Vivian Carvalho	04/09/21	$212.80	
Mileage Reimbursement	Vivian Carvalho	04/20/21	$212.80	
Mileage Reimbursement

Tolls	Vivian Carvalho	04/09/21	$3.66	
Tolls	Vivian Carvalho	04/20/21	$3.66	
Tolls
Total Expenses: $1,353.74

box

INVOICE
INV08836098
PO Number:

Sold To: Ripollv@pfm.com Jennifer L Walden

Bill To: Ripollv@pfm com Jennifer L Walden
12051 Corporate Blvd.

Orlando Florida 32817 United States

Account Number:	B01463525 Invoice Number:	INV08836098
PO Number:

Invoice Date:		03/27/2021 Payment Due By:		03/27/2021 Payment Terms:	Due Upon Receipt Payment Method:		CreditCard

Service	Unit Price	Quantity	Subtotal	Tax	TOTAL	
Business Plus Account Licenses
Service Period: 03/2612021-03/25/2022	$300.00	3	$900.00	$0.00	$900.00	
	Invoice Subtotal:	$900.00	
	Tax:	$0.00	
	Total:	$900.00	
	,B alance
Due:	$0.00	
	Currency:	USD	

03/27/2021

P-09956331

Balance Due:

$0.00

Please note that failure to pay this invoice by the due date provided may result in suspension of services and the accrual of a late fee as outlined in the Box Service Agreement .

Payments remitted without reference to relevant invoice number(s) will not be processed and will be returned.

Need to Update your Credit Card? Submit new billing information securely online at: https://www.box.com/update (be sure to login as the Box administrator)

Account Number: Invoice Date: Invoice Number: Payment Due Date: Total Amount Due:

B01463525 03/27/2021 INV08836098 03/27/2021
$0.00

Amount Enclosed:     	

Copy of our W-9: billing.app.box.com/W-9

General billing inquiries: https:1/community.box.com/
For additional billing assistance or to pay by credit card, submit a case by visiting: https:1/cloud.box.com/SubmtiCase or call us at:
1-877-729-4269

Box Inc. I 900 Jefferson Ave, Redwood City, CA 94063

Empl. Name:	PFM Group Consulting LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2021

Vivian Carvalho	

Date:	
4/9/2021	

Client Name:	
Univers ity Park Recreation District	

Proj .#	
University Park Recreation District	

Total Mileage@ 56 cents

Expense Amount	
190 mileage one way and 380 roundt r ip	
	380 • .56= 212.80	

Purpose:	
University Park Recreation District BOS Meeting	

 	
	PFM Group Consulting LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	
Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj .#		

Total Mileage @ 56 cents	
Expense Amount Purpose:		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC Miscellaneous Expense Rece ipt - 2021	
Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj .#		

Total Mileage@ 56 cents	
Expense Amount Purpo se:		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	
Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj .#		
Total Mileage @ 56 cents Expense Amount		

Purpose:		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC
Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	

Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj .#		

Total Mileage@ 56 cents

Expense Amount		

Purpose :		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	

Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Clien t Name:		

Proj .#		

Total Mileage@ 56 cents

Expense Amount		

Purpose :		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	

Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj.#		
Total Mileage@ 56 cents Expense Amount		

Purpose:		

	PFM Group Consulti ng LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Receipt - 2021	

Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj .#		

Total Mileage @ 56 cents

Expense Amount	

Pur pose:		

Accoun t #152 4766	TRANSACTION VIEW	Generated   4/1512021 17:18

POSTED DATE	
TRANSACTION DATE	
TRANSACTION TIME	

TRANSACTION NUMBER	
TOLL TAG #/ PLATE #	

AGENCY NAME	

LANE	

AXLE	

DESCRIPTION/ PLAZA NAME	

AMOUNT	
04/09/2021	
04/09/2021	
10:21:01 AM	330 64682861	027837401010	
Florida Turnpike Enterprise	
2S	
2	
SR528 Bchline West Main WB MP6	
($1.95)	
04/10/2021	
04/09/2021	
10:11:28AM	33070047043	027837401010	
Central Florida Expressway Authority	
01 48	
2	
SR 528 BEACHLINE	
($0.92)	
04/10/202 1	
04 /09 /2021	
10:04 :23 AM	33070051729	027837401010	
Cenlral Florida Expressway Authority	
0088	
2	
SR 528 DALLAS (M)	
($0.79)	

Vector eCustomer
1 o/ 1

UPRD Meeting Meal Expense 4.9.21

Welco e to Wawa #5224
Phone:941-217-7479
5208 University Parkway
Sarasota , FL 34243
4/9/2021	1 2: 32: 1 1 PM Trx # 7099718
Resi!d er U13	Cashi er:	Patty

Total:	S10. 76

Order #711
Jfl STEAK TSTO		
$3.89	
+	CARAMELIZED	ONIONS	$0. 50	
ltaster Tran:			
LARGE MIXED FRUIT 11 .202	$3.39	
C20 PURE COCONUT WATER 1 7.5	$2.49	
Sub-Total:	$10.27	
fox:	$0.19	
Total:	$10.76	
H11aterCard:	$10.76	
Chan9e:	$0.00	

..

Sale Mastt!rCard
Card Num : XXXXXXXXXXXX8330
Chip Read

Term.l nal Approval Sequ1rnce

XXXXXXXXX2001 009932
061180

USO$ 1 0.76

Masforcard Mode: Issuer
AID: A0000000011010 TVR : 0000008000
IAD :
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
TSI: E800 AR C: 00
ARQC : 5B75E511D1741276

*	YOUR OPINION MATTERS!	*
Tell us about your experience at *
www. MyWawaV isit .com	*
Tijke our survey for a chance to win *
Wawa swag sift baskets and	*
* sift cards valued at up to $500! *
Disponible en Espanol	*
IIIINll*lllllll********************■*I*l
Survey Code: 3099718	*
Store Number:05224	*
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Please respond within 5 days
NO PURCHASE NECESSARV
See rules on website

Empl. Name:

Date:
Client Name: Proj .#	PFM Group Consulting LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Recei pt -  2020

Vi vian Carvalho		

Empl. Name:

Date:

Client Name:

Proj .#	PFM Gr oup Consul ti ng LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receip t - 2020	
	
4/20/2021				
	
UPRD				
	
UPRD				

Total Mileage@ .56 cents Expense Amount
Purpose:	

190 miles one way. Round Tr ip= 380 miles		

Tot al Mi leage @ .56  cents	
	
380 • .56= $212.80		Expense Amount Purpose:		
	
UPRD Continued BOS Meetings			
mileage	

Empl. Name:	PFM Group Consulting LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Receipt - 2020	

Date:

Client Name: Proj.#
Total Mileage@		

	
.56 cents	

Expense Amount	

Purpose:		

	PFM Group Consulting LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Receipt   -   2020	
Empl. Name:		

Date:		

Client Name:		

Proj.#		

Total Mileage@ .56 cents	
Expense Amount Purpose:		

Empl. Name:	PF M Group Consulting LLC
Miscellaneous Expense Receipt  -  2020	

Date :

Client Name:

Proj.#

Total  Mileage @		

	
.56 cents	

Expense Amount	

Purpose:		

	PFM Group Consulti ng LLC
Misce llaneous Expense Receipt - 202 0	

Empl. Name:		

Dat e:		

Client Name:		

Proj.#		

Total Mileage@ .56 cents	

Expense Amount

Purpose:		

PFM Gr oup Consultin g LLC Miscellaneous Expense Receipt - 2020

Empl. Name:	

Date:	

Client Name:	

Proj.#	

Total Mileage@ .56 cents	

Expense Amount	

Purpose:	

	PFM Gr oup Consult ing LLC
M iscellaneous Expense Receipt  -   2020	

Empl. N ame:		

Date:		

Client Na me:		

Proj.#		

Total Mileage@ .56 cents

Expense Amount	

Pur pose:		

Account #1524766	TRANSACTION VIEW	Generated 4/21/2021 8:40

POSTED DATE	
TRANSACTION DATE	
TRANSACTION TIME	
TRANSACTION NUMBER	
TOLL TAG # /
PLATE #	

AGENCY NAME	

LANE	

AXLE	

DE SCRIPTION / PLAZA NAME	

AMOUNT	
04/20/2021	
04/20/2021	
07:33:08 AM	33122447075	027837401010	
Florida Turnpike Enterprise	
2S	
2	
SR528 BCHLINE WEST MAIN WB MP6	
($1.95)	
04/21/2021	
04/20/2021	
07:22:23AM	33127549617	027837401010	
Central Florida Expressway Authority	
014B	
2	
SR 528 BEACHLINE	
($0.92)	
04/21/2021	
04/20/2021	
07:15:20 AM	33127548760	0278374010 1 0	
Centra l Florida Expressway Authority	
009B	
2	
SR 528 DALLAS (M)	
($0.79)	

UPRD BOS Continued Meeting 4.2 0 .21 Total Amount of Tolls: $3 .66

Vector eCustomer
1 o/1

ID :
Invoice: Date:

10619
13477
May 13, 2021

University Park Recreation District John Fetsick, Director of Finance 7671 The Park Boulevard University Park, FL 34201

Please make your check payable to Phillips Harvey Group and enclose the top portion of this invoice with your payment.

For professional service rendered as follows:

Progress billing for fees relative to the Audit for the period ending September 30, 2020	$	2,000.00	
Time incurred relative to reconciliation/posting all applicable entries for purchase allocations and revised trial balance amounts and reconciling final FFE amounts to Club's records	1,025.00	
Please pay this amount:	
$	3,025.00	

INVOICE
DUE AND PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT
A monthly finance charge of 1 1/2% will be applied on all unpaid items after 30 days.
This monthly finance charge is calculated at an Annual Percentage Rate of 18%.

Phillips Harvey
GROUP

Certified Public Accountants
801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 303, Naples, FL 34108
P 239 566 1600 I F 239 566 1901 I swflcpas.com

VGlobalTech
636 Fanning Drive
Winter Springs, FL 32708 US contact@vglobaltech.com www.vglobaltech.com

INVOICE
BILL TO
UniversityParkRD COD 12051 Corporate Blvd.
Orlando, FL 32817

INVOICE # 2694
DATE 05/01/2021
DUE DATE 05/01/2021
TERMS Due on receipt

DATE	rr•'
Web Maintenance:ADA Website Maintenance
Ongoing website maintenance for
ADA and WCAG Compliance

T	

208.33	208.33

Please make check payable to VGlobalTech .	BALANCE DUE	$208.33

University Park Recreation District

Supervisor Requests